| Revision as of 23:54, 5 December 2006 editWJBscribe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,293 editsm →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:55, 5 December 2006 edit undoとある白い猫 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,796 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| *'''Keep''' - all the assertions there are lifted straight from dialogue; there's no supposition, extrapolation or synthesis on this particular page. Primary sources (i.e. episodes) are listed rather than the Encyclopedia secondary source (which corroborates these statements in the various episode, character and JAG entries) to give readers a more useful link to related material. --] 23:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' - all the assertions there are lifted straight from dialogue; there's no supposition, extrapolation or synthesis on this particular page. Primary sources (i.e. episodes) are listed rather than the Encyclopedia secondary source (which corroborates these statements in the various episode, character and JAG entries) to give readers a more useful link to related material. --] 23:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - There have been a lot of Star Trek nominations that have seemed unfair. This is not one. The coverage adds nothing beyond what would be contained in individual episodes. Misplaced Pages cannot have an article about every position ever suggested to exist in every fictional universe. What are we to have next- an article on ''those with responsibility for cleaning toilets in the Star Trek Universe''? The subject is not notable even within its own fictional universe. ] 23:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - There have been a lot of Star Trek nominations that have seemed unfair. This is not one. The coverage adds nothing beyond what would be contained in individual episodes. Misplaced Pages cannot have an article about every position ever suggested to exist in every fictional universe. What are we to have next- an article on ''those with responsibility for cleaning toilets in the Star Trek Universe''? The subject is not notable even within its own fictional universe. ] 23:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Article is in pathetic shape. Judge Advocate General was one of the first branches of starfleet to be established far into 1960's TOS era. --<small>] ]</small> 23:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:55, 5 December 2006
Starfleet Judge Advocate General
- Starfleet Judge Advocate General (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
This is a synthesis from primary sources, i.e. original research. Does it have a place here if rewritten to fix that? Maybe, maybe not; I'd call it fancruft and leave this to Memory Alpha, but that's an aside. This article is OR and needs to be referenced from reliable secondary sources or deleted. Guy (Help!) 23:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - all the assertions there are lifted straight from dialogue; there's no supposition, extrapolation or synthesis on this particular page. Primary sources (i.e. episodes) are listed rather than the Encyclopedia secondary source (which corroborates these statements in the various episode, character and JAG entries) to give readers a more useful link to related material. --EEMeltonIV 23:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - There have been a lot of Star Trek nominations that have seemed unfair. This is not one. The coverage adds nothing beyond what would be contained in individual episodes. Misplaced Pages cannot have an article about every position ever suggested to exist in every fictional universe. What are we to have next- an article on those with responsibility for cleaning toilets in the Star Trek Universe? The subject is not notable even within its own fictional universe. WJBscribe 23:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Article is in pathetic shape. Judge Advocate General was one of the first branches of starfleet to be established far into 1960's TOS era. --Cat out 23:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)