| Revision as of 10:10, 6 December 2006 editThink outside the box (talk | contribs)4,453 edits →User warnings: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:12, 6 December 2006 edit undoPlrk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,219 edits Swedish Anarcho-syndicalist Youth FederationNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| :Ok yes, i will do that aswell. where is the warning templeate page? Also do I have to warn them when reverting vandalisum or can someone else do it? ] 10:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | :Ok yes, i will do that aswell. where is the warning templeate page? Also do I have to warn them when reverting vandalisum or can someone else do it? ] 10:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::thanks for your help! ] 10:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | ::thanks for your help! ] 10:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Swedish Anarcho-syndicalist Youth Federation == | |||
| Hi. I read your comment on the 3RR board, claiming Itake at least had argued his point and it should have been gone through more thoroughly on the talk page. Have you read that ] lately? It is quite apparent he did't have a clue about what he was talking about, to be honest. ] (] ° ]) 10:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:12, 6 December 2006
Balino-Antimod
Were you talking about me? There's nothing wrong with my name, it's actually a surname. It's best you just relax and not cause trouble friend--Balino-Antimod 05:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Antimod has a secret meaning, not telling. But Balino, as Sugaar knows, is a surname.--Balino-Antimod 05:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Vandal at Khoikhoi's talk page.
Thanks. I would never delete an insult on someone else's talk page, except if it was full of obscenities like this one was. I do not think it is controversial to say that I also recognized part of the IP number. Khoikhoi has since found out more about 66.36.141.28 (talk · contribs)- you may have a look at the user page of the gentleman.--Pan Gerwazy 11:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry
Sorry about that. When I saw the page, I only looked at the picture and thought it was something analagous to the Fleshlight. When I looked more closely, that's why I freaked out and nuked it.—Řÿūłóñģ (竜龍) 07:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- I must admit, that was one of the funniest discussions I've ever had on Misplaced Pages.--Vercalos 07:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but I am saddened to tell you that I requested that it be sent off into a packet of space where no one will read it again. Too embarassing :P—Řÿūłóñģ (竜龍) 07:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'd noticed. I even know who purged it from your history.. I would have archived it for pure amusement value, but I wouldn't want to bother you(even if I did, I would have kept the names anonymous, however).--Vercalos 07:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but I am saddened to tell you that I requested that it be sent off into a packet of space where no one will read it again. Too embarassing :P—Řÿūłóñģ (竜龍) 07:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi
Thank you for correcting me - I'd never done put a warning template on anything, and I'm afraid I'm still confused about templates in general.
Since I'm here - can you tell me which welcome template has the automatic "this is an IP address, checkuser, whois, yada-yada" with it? Or is that just an admin template? Thanks again, NinaEliza 07:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, Vercalos (she says as she smacks her forehead, because she knew that one), I'll be more careful next time. I didn't cut and paste the whole code though, which is a big improvement! Cheers.NinaEliza 08:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
User warnings
yes i will - i just trying to avoid attackts by giving them the link to my page. Think outside the box 09:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ok yes, i will do that aswell. where is the warning templeate page? Also do I have to warn them when reverting vandalisum or can someone else do it? Think outside the box 10:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- thanks for your help! Think outside the box 10:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Swedish Anarcho-syndicalist Youth Federation
Hi. I read your comment on the 3RR board, claiming Itake at least had argued his point and it should have been gone through more thoroughly on the talk page. Have you read that talk page lately? It is quite apparent he did't have a clue about what he was talking about, to be honest. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 10:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)