Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Personal attacks: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:23, 7 December 2006 editCoredesat (talk | contribs)22,795 edits →{{User|LSLM}}: blocked 24h← Previous edit Revision as of 18:26, 7 December 2006 edit undoCoredesat (talk | contribs)22,795 editsm →{{User|LSLM}}: fixNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
*Continues attacks: *Continues attacks:
] 00:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC) ] 00:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
**LSLM blocked for 24 hours for personal attacks. --''']]''' 18:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC) :*LSLM '''blocked for 24 hours''' for personal attacks. --''']]''' 18:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


==={{User|NazireneMystic}}=== ==={{User|NazireneMystic}}===

Revision as of 18:26, 7 December 2006

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards


    Red crossThis is a failed proposal.
    Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump.
    This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
    Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump.
    ShortcutThis page is intended to get attention quickly when dealing with personal attacks. It is not intended to serve as a form of mediation or a type of RFC. Only Personal attacks are dealt with on this page, on their own merits in accordance with Misplaced Pages's No Personal Attacks policy

    For editors who want a personal attack situation reviewed:

    1. Consider that in most cases, ignoring the attack is better than requesting sanction against the attacker. Do not report people if you are likewise guilty of hostility towards them.
    2. Make sure the user has actually commited a personal attack. (Please note that "personal attacks" are defined only under the WP:NPA policy. If a statement is not considered a personal attack under the intended spirit of this policy, it does not belong here.)
    3. The editor must have been warned earlier. The {{npa2}}, and {{npa3}} templates may be appropriate for new users; for long-term editors, it's preferable to write something rather than using a standard template. Reports of unwarned editors may be removed.
    4. If the behavior hasn't stopped, add the following header to the New Reports section of this page in the following format:
      ==={{User|NAME OF USER}}=== replacing NAME OF USER with the user name or IP address concerned, with a brief reason for listing below. Be sure to include diffs.
    5. If an editor removes the IP or username and doesn't handle the matter to your satisfaction, take it to the editor's talk page or the administrators' noticeboard, but do not re-list the user here.
    6. NB - Due to misunderstanding of these instructions and/or mis-use of this process, comments not in strict adhereance to these instructions WILL be removed. This page deals only with personal attacks under the policy WP:NPA. Reports deemed to be inappropriate for this page are liable to be moved to an appropriate venue where one exists.


    For those reported on this page:

    1. A reviewer or an administrator will review each report on this page. In dealing with the report, the contribution history of the reported user shall be checked along with the diffs provided in the report. Where no personal attack is evident, then no action will be taken - however, should an administrator see that another seperate issue is evident, appropriate action or advice for that issue may be taken/given at his or her discretion and in line with wiki policy.
    2. Reports on this page stand on their own merits in accordance with Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. As such, disputes and discussions over reports are not suitable for this page except for such comments left by admins or reviewers describing their actions and/or findings. If you notice your account reported at this page, please trust that the administrators and reviewers dealing with reports will deal with it in an even-handed and fair manner on the basis of policy alone. If you feel strongly that another "side to the story", issue, or another piece of information is missing from a report please refrain from posting here, and instead leave your comment on your talk page under the title NPA Report or another other clear and related title. The reviewing party will see this message and take it into account where applicable.

    For users handling assistance requests:

    1. For each of the users linked here, open their contributions and check for personal attacks. Also check if the users have been sufficiently warned for the current personal attack and whether they've continued to commit personal attacks after being warned.
    2. Note that there is an important difference between a user who makes many good contributions and a few personal attacks, and a user whose last edits are (nearly) all personal attacks or other conflict.
    3. Do nothing, warn them again, or, if you are an adminstrator, block the user in question as you think is required. Explain things carefully to the user who listed the attacker if you feel there's been a misunderstanding.
    4. Move the report to the Open Reports section and give an update to the status of the report.
    5. Delete old reports that have been dealt with.

    Please consider adding this page to your watchlist to make life easier for non-administrator RC-patrollers.

    New reports

    LSLM (talk · contribs)

    • Reported twice:
    • Warned twice:
    • Continues attacks:

    Lukas19 00:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

    NazireneMystic (talk · contribs)

    This user left some inappropriate comments on the Talk:Ebionites page and . User logged in anonymously (63.215.29.103 and 209.244.30.107) and left his name. This user has been warned previously by an admin and received two blocks for similar behavior. Slow learner. Requesting a 72 hour block this time. Ovadyah 23:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

    Adding one more from subsequent edit on Talk:Ebionites page . Ovadyah 14:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
    I forgot to mention that this user has a second alias with an identical talk page which avoided the previous blocks User_talk:SpiritualEbionite. Ovadyah 15:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

    Open reports

    CrnaGora (talk · contribs)

    This User has gotten somewhat frustrated in several disputes, and it has gotten beyond control (very sadly). In an edit summery, while reverting Template:User cg, he wrote in rough Serbo-Croat I fuck your mother, Nikola! I understand Montenegrin better than you understand Serbian. Momisan I am on yours side till my deaths. This user is normally very constructive, but this is not the first occasion that he reacted, as nuclear reactors do (when they overheat). On one occasion before he called a user a Serb whore - and I warned him indeed for trying to ease down his tempter several times. --PaxEquilibrium 15:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

    Blocked by user Duja for 24 h for personal attacks. Syrthiss 16:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

    195.84.40.9 (talk · contribs)

    The user posted insulting words and keeps on posting clean up marks on articles in wikipedia without explaining why.

    (cur) (last) 11:15, 6 December 2006 195.84.40.9 (Talk) (←Created page with 'HEY, stop removing the cleanup tag from Banate, Iloilo without saying why. you stupid fuck.

    Try to edit this page and see how his post will read. He tries to use certain conventions (using font size=1 color=white in the template of his post)to hide his uncivil attack to other users. This user discredits wikipedia. News is already spreading around the academe that wikipedia is no longer a credible source of information and articles are said to be opinions of authors whose creditbility is in question. I think contributors like User: 195.84.40.9 add to this ill reputation that is being spread about wikipedia. If you change "font size=1 color=white" to "font size=1 color=red" of in the template od his post on my user page talk will read as follows:

    (←Created page with 'HEY, stop removing the cleanup tag from Banate, Iloilo without saying why. you stupid fuck.

    Very clever and malicious attacks!

    Check my user talk page and the thing he posted: User talk:85.20.31.49 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.20.31.49 (talk • contribs)

    Warned by Syrthiss at about 12:30 on Dec 7 --Trödel 14:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

    67.110.68.99 (talk · contribs)

    Abusive edit summaries and talk comments . Warning only made things worse. He requests that we "do something about it". Kafziel 19:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


    Magencio (talk · contribs)

    I have already warned him twice for the following abuses: diff 1 diff 2, calling me terrorist.

    Now he's made a new personal attack diff 3 saying (allegedly in the name of banned user Albinomite, of whom he admits to be a meatpuppet):

    The difference is a meatpuppet's got claws and can fight back. "Suck kind of people should not even exist," what kind of people do you mean exactly? Please elaborate. Also I have a message from Albinomite: Estamos hartos hasta los cojones de lambeculos comunistas como tú, si tanto repudias a España entonces ¿por que no te largas a Venezuela o Cuba? Ahí seguramente estarías feliz con el resto de los monos y comunistas.Legio Semper Fidelis.--Magencio 12:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

    Translation of the Spanish language part: We are sick of arse-licking communists like you, if you repudiate spain so much then why don't you go away to Venezuela or Cuba? You would surely be happy there with the rest of monkeys and communists. The Legio Semper Fidelis part (Latin) seems a fascist/militarist slogan: "always faithful to the Legion", whatever that means. --Sugaar 13:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


    K42 (talk · contribs)

    User did not like my reversions, so user left abusive edit summary at my talk page. I used "npa3" to warn user, and user deleted warning. User then returned to my talk page and repeated same abusive language. — coelacan talk — 23:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

    User has continued personal attacks after final warning, calling me more abusive names on Shell's talk page ("scum", "rat"), and threatening to make a new sockpuppet account to circumvent any forthcoming block. With that threat in mind, I should point out that user also edits from IP 202.9.48.50 (see where K42 reinstates the IP's vandalism). Editing as IP, user vandalized the user page of editor who reverted the earlier vandalism. That may or may not have been a personal attack, in any case it occurred before final warning, but this last round on Shell's user page was a direct response to the final warning. — coelacan talk — 15:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

    User has now attacked blocking admin Luna Santin, with words I care not repeat. — coelacan talk — 06:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

    Wow.. All he had to do was wait a day, and he'd be able to edit again, but now? He's probably earned himself an extended block.--Vercalos 06:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

    Factanista (talk · contribs)

    User:Factanista has just made uncivil comments about on his talk page. In Croatian, he said I consider that propaganda of yoursdisgusting and regardless of your GreaterSerbianpropaganda. These are heavy personal attacks. --PaxEquilibrium 23:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

    User doesn't appear to have been warned about personal attacks and since this is the only attack presented, no further action was taken. Also, he's describing the actions of someone who he feels is labeling him, not directly attacking a person. Shell 19:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
    He has made all kinds of other personal attacks, including inviting Jesus to "f**k" my mother, among many others. Anyway, the user got banned as established that he's the sockpuppet of User:Afrika paprika, so I guess it's no longer important. --PaxEquilibrium 17:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


    195.224.113.189 (talk · contribs)

    User:195.224.113.189 has sworn and made deorgatory remarks, eg. "resident dickead" and "TO BE HONEST I COULDN'T GIVE A TOSS WHAT YOKELS LIKE YOU WANT TO TELL YOURSELVES." at Talk:Wigan. Warning posted to their Talk page but behaviour has continued. Regan123 13:32, 2 December 2006 (UTC)





    Esteqlal (talk · contribs)

    New user. Single purpose disruptor. Made personal attacks in my talk page, I warned him but he keeps blanking his talk page and bogus warning me back. Incivil edit summaries. Causing disruption through his personal attacks to me. Hkelkar 20:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

    Wbroun (talk · contribs)

    Also:

    New user. Multiple instances of personal attacks. Warned three times on user talk. Warned and given advice by me and other admins in article talk pages to avoid PAs and engage with civility.

    Diffs
    • First warning:
    • Second:
    • Third"

    After being warned three times, he continues: see last comment.

    As I have been involved in editing that article as a third-party editor (I am not associated with the subject of the article in any way or manner), and given the animosity demonstrated by this user, it may be better that another admin takes the necessary action to curtail the disruption caused. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

    This user continues:

    • Fourth diff

    I would appreciate it if someone takes a look. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

    Categories: