Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 10:00, 30 November 2019

WP:RETENTION This editor is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.

GOCE March drive newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive update Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter. Participation: We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far. Special thanks: Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (talk), Stfg (talk), and Dank (talk) To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

test

GOCE February blitz wrapup

Guild of Copy Editors Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Blitzes/February 2014 wrap-up Participation: Out of seven people who signed up for this blitz, all copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we removed 16 articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the March drive! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by

Met releases images/ Note to self

http://www.nbcnews.com/slideshow/met-digitizes-its-collection-releasing-350-00-images-free-n719661

Thanks for removing falsehoods.

Thank you for removing them. I mostly do it when I found them, but I guess I missed some of them. MikkelJSmith (talk) 00:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

I was really shocked actually at the way the sources were being misrepresented. I'm going through them more carefully now given what I've seen. Thanks for your work as well. Littleolive oil (talk) 03:44, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments on my work. I'm a bit behind in what I need to add. Due to work, I haven't added two big news stories regarding the CPC campaign. MikkelJSmith (talk) 12:23, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Given the subject of the article it is not surprising that false information is being added. The best reaction is to read the refs and fix accordingly! - Ahunt (talk) 13:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

I'm traveling again and may not be able to do much more on the articles. Best. Littleolive oil (talk) 23:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rojava

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rojava. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox person

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox person. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Interest in other editors

This, your twentieth edit on that sister project, after over eight months of absence there, starts to look surprisingly much like some sort of hounding: it is the third talk page, in a short time, where you jump in a discussion on a topic which before attracted little or nothing of your interest, immediately giving (mostly rather off-topic) negative comments about my editing. Please cease and desist with that behaviour. I've had much more dealings with the commons platform than you appear to have had, so I know what I can suggest or not, and need no comments that I should rather shut up and listen than offer suggestions. Where were you when composer autographs were sorted in correct categories in that sister project? Please be welcome to assist, but your off-topic negative comments (without actually fixing anything) help nobody. --Francis Schonken (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2019 (UTC)