| Revision as of 06:27, 8 December 2006 editHkelkar (talk | contribs)7,279 edits →D'Souza's wife← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:42, 8 December 2006 edit undoHkelkar (talk | contribs)7,279 edits →"their position was different..."Next edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| This statement needs factual backing. Our activities were supported by a number of progressive Hindu organizations.] 01:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | This statement needs factual backing. Our activities were supported by a number of progressive Hindu organizations.] 01:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::"Progressive Hindu orgs" run by Islamist fronts like FOSA with "Allah will destroy the terrorist state of India" right up on their website? Yeah, right.] 06:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | ::"Progressive Hindu orgs" run by Islamist fronts like FOSA with "Allah will destroy the terrorist state of India" right up on their website? Yeah, right.] 06:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Evidence: | |||
| # http://www.friendsofsouthasia.org/events/indpakpeace/ Association with the "Pakistan American Alliance" | |||
| # PAA is a terrorist front with "Allah will destroy the terrorist state of India" as a motto | |||
| #When exposed, they hastily "removed" the links and "ended their association" with PAA. Yeah, right. ] | |||
| == Fact tag for 'missionary' description == | == Fact tag for 'missionary' description == | ||
Revision as of 09:42, 8 December 2006
Why do you keep changing our information? Please stop. You are misrepresenting us. We are not a missionary organization nor have we ever been.
--Benjaminmarsh 17:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- There is nothing in the article that suggests missionary activity.. Merely that DFN works with several anti-Hindu personalities and organizations and often misrepresents itself as Hindu when, in fact, it is Christian.Hkelkar 22:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- but again, someone has changed it to suggest missionary activity. We aren't missionaries.Benjaminmarsh 21:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- If there's something you disagree with, could I suggest you indicate this with{{fact}} or {{dubious}} after the statement. In Misplaced Pages, the burden of proof is always on those who want information to be included. Accordingly, you are within your rights to request citations. Also, could I suggest you avoid using the revert function, unless for obvious vandalism. Thanks, Addhoc 19:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
D'Souza's wife
this information is not pertinent to the article. Nor, for that matter, is the fact that neither nanci nor joseph are Dalits. Is the founder of "save the whales" a whale? Benjaminmarsh 01:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- So you're equating Dalits with whales? Racism. Typical of Bible-Thumping missionary groups. Hkelkar 06:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
"their position was different..."
This statement needs factual backing. Our activities were supported by a number of progressive Hindu organizations.Benjaminmarsh 01:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- "Progressive Hindu orgs" run by Islamist fronts like FOSA with "Allah will destroy the terrorist state of India" right up on their website? Yeah, right.Hkelkar 06:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Evidence:
- http://www.friendsofsouthasia.org/events/indpakpeace/ Association with the "Pakistan American Alliance"
- PAA is a terrorist front with "Allah will destroy the terrorist state of India" as a motto
- When exposed, they hastily "removed" the links and "ended their association" with PAA. Yeah, right. Hkelkar
Fact tag for 'missionary' description
I've tagged the 'missionary' description, considering this is a weekend, I'll give 48 hours to find a citation before removing the word. Addhoc 21:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Article by Crystal Hsu and PN Benjamin
This article should not be included. HVK.org is not a source for dispassionate information but is an opinion site in support of hindutva. The source does not meet wikipedia's requirements. Benjaminmarsh 01:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's an archive of a legit news source and satisfies wiki requirements just fine.Hkelkar 01:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
This article doesn't appear to mention a missionary agenda, accordingly I have given the sentence a failed verification tag. If there isn't a response in 48 hours, then I'll remove the word "missionary". Addhoc 11:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Reworded to better reflect source.Hkelkar 12:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)