| Revision as of 08:39, 3 December 2019 editAustronesier (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,117 edits add sign← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:24, 3 December 2019 edit undoAustronesier (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,117 edits →December 2019Next edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | ||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> –] (]) 08:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC) | If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> –] (]) 08:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| On another note, I would like you to ] while interacting with other editors. Calling other editor's contributions "propaganda and vandalism" and titulating them as "Russian agents" does not help to create an environment for constructive editing. This also includes reporting other editors for vandalism, when they disagree with your point of view in an ongoing content dispute. –] (]) 09:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:24, 3 December 2019
October 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Moscow; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 14:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Keep in mind that there was a missing citation on the matter, and the writing of that particular portion of the article did not point to it being established by then. Something to think about in terms of accuracy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UkrainianSavior1 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Old East Slavic; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Austronesier (talk) 08:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
On another note, I would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Calling other editor's contributions "propaganda and vandalism" and titulating them as "Russian agents" does not help to create an environment for constructive editing. This also includes reporting other editors for vandalism, when they disagree with your point of view in an ongoing content dispute. –Austronesier (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)