| Revision as of 11:39, 10 January 2003 editMartinHarper (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,927 edits spoiler warning, libertarian socialism, Sapir-Whorf hypothesis← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:20, 27 April 2003 edit undoMartinHarper (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,927 editsm rm extra lineNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| The book won the ] and ] awards. | The book won the ] and ] awards. | ||
| See also ] | See also ] | ||
Revision as of 17:20, 27 April 2003
The Dispossesed is a science fiction novel by Ursula K. Le Guin, set in the same universe as that of The Left Hand of Darkness (the Ekumen universe).
Warning: Misplaced Pages contains spoilers
It takes place in a double planet system similar to the Earth and its moon, except that the moon is massive enough to hold an atmosphere. In the aftermath of a failed anarchist revolution, the rebels were exiled to the moon about two hundred years prior to the events of the story.
The protagonist Shevek is an anarchist physicist/philosopher attempting to develop a theory which will allow the construction of an ansible, a faster-than-light communications device, but his efforts are blocked by parochial and xenophobic attitudes in his home society.
He therefore embarks on the risky journey to the original planet seeking the conversation with other mathematicians and physicists which will bring his theory to fruition. The plot explores his struggles on the anarchist planet, as well as his struggles after he travels to the original planet.
The book also explores the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis: on the anarchist planet the use of the possessive case is strongly discouraged. An example is given where a little girl says to Shevek that he may share in the handkerchief that she uses: the idea is that the handkerchief is not owned by the girl, merely carried by her.
The Dispossessed is considered by many libertarian socialists to be a good description of the mechanisms that would be developed by an anarchist society, but also of the dangers of centralization and bureaucracy that easily take over such society without the continuation of revolutionary ideology.
The work is sometimes said to represent one of the few modern revivals of the utopian genre, though it is notable that one of the major themes of the work is the ambiguity of different notions of utopia.
The book won the Hugo and Nebula awards.
See also Anarchism in the arts