Revision as of 07:24, 19 December 2019 editFoption (talk | contribs)29 edits →Belligerents versus suppliers in infobox← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:11, 19 December 2019 edit undoRGloucester (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits →Belligerents versus suppliers in infobox: rNext edit → | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
:In Misplaced Pages conflict infoboxes we regularly include "support" countries as a sub-heading under "Belligerents". Just a few ongoing examples are the Syrian and Libyan civil wars. Countries only providing weapons support and not being directly involved have also been listed in the infoboxes of many past conflicts. ] (]) 01:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC) | :In Misplaced Pages conflict infoboxes we regularly include "support" countries as a sub-heading under "Belligerents". Just a few ongoing examples are the Syrian and Libyan civil wars. Countries only providing weapons support and not being directly involved have also been listed in the infoboxes of many past conflicts. ] (]) 01:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
:But U.S. Secretary confirmed weapon supplies exactly for this conflict. It is support of Ukraine in conflict. Source: https://www.state.gov/secretary-michael-r-pompeo-with-michal-higdon-of-wcsc-tv/ "U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo: We gave them real weapons, where they could fight against the Russians" --] (]) 07:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC) | :But U.S. Secretary confirmed weapon supplies exactly for this conflict. It is support of Ukraine in conflict. Source: https://www.state.gov/secretary-michael-r-pompeo-with-michal-higdon-of-wcsc-tv/ "U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo: We gave them real weapons, where they could fight against the Russians" --] (]) 07:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
::The Russian and American roles are not equivalent, and any attempt to portray them as such is a violation of ] and non-representative of RS. ] — ] 12:11, 19 December 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:11, 19 December 2019
International Coalition in support of Ukraine was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 February 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into War in Donbas. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the War in Donbas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Ukrainian place names are transliterated using the National system. Please see the guidelines on the romanization of Ukrainian on Misplaced Pages for more information. |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
“the”
Please decide whether it is “Donbass” or “the Donbass” and either always omit or always use the article. 24.143.11.227 (talk) 11:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- English usage is not consistent in this matter. See ngrams, though these are from before the war. I think the general trend is to omit the article, though. RGloucester — ☎ 16:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Belligerents versus suppliers in infobox
No reference showing UK is a belligerent. There's no way that supplying weapons to a belligerent in a conflict makes a country a belligerent. "Support" is a different category altogether. Am WP:BOLD removing flags from infobox including with citations showing weapons supplies. If you want to add "support" to the infobox, then it needs a separate section, not a sub-heading under "Belligerents"; but note that section would not be in keeping with Misplaced Pages norms. -Chumchum7 (talk) 06:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- In Misplaced Pages conflict infoboxes we regularly include "support" countries as a sub-heading under "Belligerents". Just a few ongoing examples are the Syrian and Libyan civil wars. Countries only providing weapons support and not being directly involved have also been listed in the infoboxes of many past conflicts. EkoGraf (talk) 01:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- But U.S. Secretary confirmed weapon supplies exactly for this conflict. It is support of Ukraine in conflict. Source: https://www.state.gov/secretary-michael-r-pompeo-with-michal-higdon-of-wcsc-tv/ "U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo: We gave them real weapons, where they could fight against the Russians" --Foption (talk) 07:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- The Russian and American roles are not equivalent, and any attempt to portray them as such is a violation of WP:NPOV and non-representative of RS. RGloucester — ☎ 12:11, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- B-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- B-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- B-Class European history articles
- Mid-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages
- B-Class Russia articles
- High-importance Russia articles
- High-importance B-Class Russia articles
- WikiProject Russia articles with no associated task force
- WikiProject Russia articles
- B-Class Ukraine articles
- Top-importance Ukraine articles
- WikiProject Ukraine articles