| Revision as of 16:18, 9 December 2006 editPaul Raj (talk | contribs)2,128 edits →Thanks← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:41, 10 December 2006 edit undoBharatveer (talk | contribs)4,593 edits →Ayyavazhi: rm commentsNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| Just wanted to say thanks for your wonderful and valuable contributions to the ] article. Thanks ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 07:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | Just wanted to say thanks for your wonderful and valuable contributions to the ] article. Thanks ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 07:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Thanks for reverting your reverts. You will agree that the passage is NPOV and is fully cited. I thank you for your help in this regard. I mean it sincerely. Cheers ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 09:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | :Thanks for reverting your reverts. You will agree that the passage is NPOV and is fully cited. I thank you for your help in this regard. I mean it sincerely. Cheers ] <sup><em>]/]</em></sup> 09:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Ayyavazhi== | |||
| Why you mentioned that Ayyavazhi is unhelpful in Tamil people article. An Ayyavazhi festival is declared as a Holiday for three dsitricts. Ayyavazhi is autonomous religiously(as per its religious studies), and it has thousands of worship centers all over India mostly in South India densely in South Tamil nadu. All these are cited with university papers. | |||
| Then how it become unhelpful in mentioning Ayyavazhi? It was autonomouse and has significant notability. Then how it become unhelpful in mentioning Ayyavazhi? Please don't revert the edits. - ] 16:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:41, 10 December 2006
Welcome!
Archive 1: February 2006 - May 2006 ; Archive2 : June 2006 - July 2006 ; Archive3 : Aug 1st,2006 - Aug 9th,2006 ; Archive4 : Aug 10th 2006 - Aug 31st 2006; Archive5 : Sept 1st 2006 - Sept 12th 2006; Archive6 : Sept 13th -Nov 6th; Archive7 : Nov 7th - Dec 4th;
Rv in Tamil people
Reverting unnecesary ruthlessness was absolutely ok. But in the process, you reveretd a new section as well - the section on cuisine, under "culture"! Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Venu62 is making destructive edits
Please revert http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Youngcvb.jpg to its earlier version. I cant do it anymore since I might violate the WP:3RR rule. Venu62 is on a rampage tagging properly licensed images with copyvio tags - I guess this what is called vandalism. Maybe people who are familiar with his destructive POV edits should complain against him collectively. ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 19:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
This one too http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Image:Chembai2.jpg&action=history ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 19:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Just a suggestion; take care when reverting so called destructive reverts. The person who has asked you to suggested complaining as a group is in enough trouble as it is. Ncmvocalist 23:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Just wanted to say thanks for your wonderful and valuable contributions to the Carnatic music article. Thanks Parthi 07:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for reverting your reverts. You will agree that the passage is NPOV and is fully cited. I thank you for your help in this regard. I mean it sincerely. Cheers Parthi 09:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)