Misplaced Pages

User talk:Alex Noble: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:34, 29 December 2019 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,816 editsm Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:OxonAlex/Archives/2. (BOT)← Previous edit Revision as of 06:25, 30 December 2019 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,816 editsm Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:OxonAlex/Archives/2. (BOT)Next edit →
Line 20: Line 20:


{{done}}. Undid reversion. <span style="color: darkgreen"> ~~ </span> ] ] 05:32, 25 December 2019 (UTC) {{done}}. Undid reversion. <span style="color: darkgreen"> ~~ </span> ] ] 05:32, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

== New Page Review newsletter December 2019 ==

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
]
<!-- ] -->
;Reviewer of the Year
]
This year's Reviewer of the Year is {{noping|Rosguill}}. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to {{noping|Onel5969}} who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to {{noping| Boleyn}} and {{noping|JTtheOG}} who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with ] and ] (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|+Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
!Rank
!Username
!Num reviews
!Log
|-
|1
|] (])
| data-sort-value="Onel5969" |47,395
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|2
|] (])
| data-sort-value="Rosguill" |41,883
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|3
|] (])
| data-sort-value="JTtheOG" |11,493
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|4
|] (])
| data-sort-value="Arthistorian1977" |5,562
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|5
|] (])
| data-sort-value="Boleyn" |4,866
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|6
|] (])
| data-sort-value="DannyS712" |3,995
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|7
|] (])
| data-sort-value="Cwmhiraeth" |3,812
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|8
|] (])
| data-sort-value="Ymblanter" |3,655
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|9
|] (])
| data-sort-value="CAPTAIN" |3,553
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|10
|] (])
|3,522
|Patrol Page Curation
|}
(''The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found ''']''''')

;Redirect autopatrol
A recent ] on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was ]. New Page Reviewers are now able to ] who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a ] whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by {{noping|DannyS712 bot III}}.

;Source Guide Discussion
Set to launch early in the new year is our first ] discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a ] prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the ] for more information.

;This month's refresher course
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on ]. Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
</div>Delivered by ] (]) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=931696676 -->

== thanks for the speedy correction of the speedy deletion ==
It was too quick for me as I am moving material from main sandbox to this temporary sub-page, to make the main sandbox useable and easier to read.
Thank you for fixing it to avoid me losing all the material collated.


== Reverting off-topic posts helps our counter-vandalism effort, and we need your help. == == Reverting off-topic posts helps our counter-vandalism effort, and we need your help. ==

Revision as of 06:25, 30 December 2019

Where this user is, it is 7:49 am, 27 December 2024 GMT .

Archives (Index)

A Short History of Nearly Everything

Would you be so kind and take a look at my recently removed and archived modification to the article A Short History of Nearly Everything. The required citations were internal Misplaced Pages links. Jonas B. 05:27, 25 December 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonasBacelis (talk • contribs)

 Done. Undid reversion. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 05:32, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Reverting off-topic posts helps our counter-vandalism effort, and we need your help.

I noticed that you chose to converse, rather than revert an off-topic post, even noting that the prior message was a violation of WP:NOTAFORUM. You are correct in your assessment, but replying to the original poster causes problems per WP:TPO. We are free to simply revert off-topic posts, but once more than a single editor is posting the conversation has to be hidden or archived, but never deleted unless it was oversighted, which doesn't apply here. That talk page gets a lot of off-topic posts from new users that cannot read simple instructions. Our archives will overflow with such wasteful comments when we serve Misplaced Pages better by just reverting and issuing a warning, as I did. In the future, please nip the problem in the bud by stopping off-topic posts. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:58, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year OxonAlex!

Happy New Year! Hello OxonAlex:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Misplaced Pages's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 23:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.