| Revision as of 16:36, 1 January 2020 edit2001:16b8:31cf:aa00:c1e0:c9f1:3a3b:e1d3 (talk) →Hinduism: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:06, 10 January 2020 edit undoKrakkos (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers23,569 edits →Proposed deletion of Category:Slavic countries and territories: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| 200 people is not enough to have it mentioned. It's not an established religion with a long tradition in Slovenia. --] (]) 16:36, 1 January 2020 (UTC) | 200 people is not enough to have it mentioned. It's not an established religion with a long tradition in Slovenia. --] (]) 16:36, 1 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
| == Proposed deletion of ] == | |||
| It is currently being proposed that ] be deleted. This article is part of that category. The relevant discussion is located at ]. The discussion would benefit from input from editors with a knowledge of and interest in Slovenia. ] (]) 11:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:06, 10 January 2020
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Slovenia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
 | A news item involving Slovenia was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 May 2010. |  |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
 | Guidelines for editing the Slovenia article
|
 | A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on June 25, 2005 and June 25, 2006. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Slovenia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
Italian War Crimes during Italian Fascist Occupation of Slovenia 1941-1943 and the change of British policy towards their persecution due to the possibility of Italian communists winning the 1946 general election
Foreign Office (i.e. British civil authority, but not the military) policy was indeed initially, as you say, in favor of 'hand-over' of the Italian war criminals, but the British and American military authorities in Italy were against it (p.520), but the Foreign Office changed its policy (ibid., p.523), too, when in 1946 the possibility was that Italian communists would win the Italian general election, which would open Italy to Soviet influence, so they decided to drop the case and let Italy do the job (ibid., p.526) resulting in the (highly indicative) fate of Graziani and Roatta (ibid., p.525). The British concern to secure the electoral victory of the Christian Democrats "prompted Britain to drop all of its war crimes claims against Italy" (ibid., p.527). See the screenshots from the scholarly article via JStor.org
References
- Effie Pedaliu (2004) Britain and the 'Hand-over' of Italian War Criminals to Yugoslavia, 1945-48. Journal of Contemporary History. Vol. 39, No. 4, Special Issue: Collective Memory, pp. 503-529 (JStor.org full article)
–– — Preceding unsigned comment added by DancingPhilosopher (talk • contribs) 11:18 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Central Europe, Southeastern Europe or Balkans?
The old discussion again. My idea was Slovenia is part from the Balkans and Southeastern Europe and also from Central Europe. Another editor insisted only on Central Europe and changed the article several times to this biased view. Now it was done again but in another form, i.e. Slovenia lies "in the central part of Europe". This is not correct neither politically nor geographically, moreover no consensus for such change was reached thanks. Jingiby (talk) 12:58, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Hinduism
200 people is not enough to have it mentioned. It's not an established religion with a long tradition in Slovenia. --2001:16B8:31CF:AA00:C1E0:C9F1:3A3B:E1D3 (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Category:Slavic countries and territories
It is currently being proposed that Category:Slavic countries and territories be deleted. This article is part of that category. The relevant discussion is located at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 January 8#Countries and territories by language family. The discussion would benefit from input from editors with a knowledge of and interest in Slovenia. Krakkos (talk) 11:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages In the news articles
- All unassessed articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class Slovenia articles
- Top-importance Slovenia articles
- All WikiProject Slovenia pages
- B-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English
- Selected anniversaries (June 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (June 2006)