Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Journal of Joan of Arc Studies: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:14, 11 December 2006 editAkhilleus (talk | contribs)13,976 editsm missed a bracket← Previous edit Revision as of 03:38, 11 December 2006 edit undoMER-C (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators250,735 edits []: deleteNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
:{{la|Journal of Joan of Arc Studies}} <includeonly> — (])</includeonly> :{{la|Journal of Joan of Arc Studies}} <includeonly> — (])</includeonly>
This journal's publisher appears to be a vanity press rather than a legitimate academic organization. In addition, according to WorldCat, the journal is not held by any libraries, and as far as I can tell has published only one issue (or perhaps none). The publication doesn't appear to be notable. ] (]) 03:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC) This journal's publisher appears to be a vanity press rather than a legitimate academic organization. In addition, according to WorldCat, the journal is not held by any libraries, and as far as I can tell has published only one issue (or perhaps none). The publication doesn't appear to be notable. ] (]) 03:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'' per nom. ] 03:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:38, 11 December 2006

Journal of Joan of Arc Studies

Journal of Joan of Arc Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This journal's publisher appears to be a vanity press rather than a legitimate academic organization. In addition, according to WorldCat, the journal is not held by any libraries, and as far as I can tell has published only one issue (or perhaps none). The publication doesn't appear to be notable. --Akhilleus (talk) 03:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Categories: