Revision as of 12:08, 13 January 2020 editMutt Lunker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers41,702 edits →January 2020: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:47, 14 January 2020 edit undo203.142.136.254 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
:I am at a loss to find a passage in that source which discusses, let alone supports your edit that "Historically, the term Lothian referred to a Province encompassing all of southern Scotland below ]-] Valley: the jurisdiction of the ]". Please highlight it if there is one. ] (]) 12:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC) | :I am at a loss to find a passage in that source which discusses, let alone supports your edit that "Historically, the term Lothian referred to a Province encompassing all of southern Scotland below ]-] Valley: the jurisdiction of the ]". Please highlight it if there is one. ] (]) 12:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
Hahaha: what a bloody joke! Page 154, paragraph 3, is staring you in the sodding face... NPC scum. | |||
] (]) 12:47, 14 January 2020 (UTC)203.142.136.254 |
Revision as of 12:47, 14 January 2020
August 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to British nationalism, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. King Arthur article states that he waged war against the Picts and the Scots, which is inconsistent with your edits. Also, facebook post links, which is generally discouraged. CommanderOzEvolved (talk) (contribs) 15:28, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at British nationalism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 21:14, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. - TNT 21:19, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
203.142.136.254 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is racist censorship and abusive bullying behaviour 203.142.136.254 (talk) 21:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
June 2019
Hello, I'm Odysseus1479. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gàidhealtachd without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.—Odysseus1479 22:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Coelbren y Beirdd. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
January 2020
Hello, I'm Mutt Lunker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lothian, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 10:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lothian, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 10:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Greetings,
The northern extent of Gododdin/Lothian from the Marches to the Forth-Clyde Valley is well-known information but here is a source demonstrating it:
It is significant to note that this source discusses the Province of Lothian (aka. the Under-Under-Kingdom of Gododdin) at an earlier time before Galloway had been made into a Province of its own.
- Approximately the area of Lancashire & Durham are actually also part of Goddodin; however the Magna Carta's Scottish section had the effect of settling the border at the Marches.
203.142.136.254 (talk) 11:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)203.142.136.254
- I am at a loss to find a passage in that source which discusses, let alone supports your edit that "Historically, the term Lothian referred to a Province encompassing all of southern Scotland below Forth-Clyde Valley: the jurisdiction of the Justiciar of Lothian". Please highlight it if there is one. Mutt Lunker (talk) 12:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Hahaha: what a bloody joke! Page 154, paragraph 3, is staring you in the sodding face... NPC scum.
203.142.136.254 (talk) 12:47, 14 January 2020 (UTC)203.142.136.254