Revision as of 22:16, 14 January 2020 editHelpUsStopSpam (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,362 edits Zap spam "source".← Previous edit |
Revision as of 21:14, 4 February 2020 edit undoUrhixidur (talk | contribs)Administrators44,767 edits fix refsNext edit → |
Line 12: |
Line 12: |
|
A ] is '''biased''' if it is calculated in |
|
A ] is '''biased''' if it is calculated in |
|
such a way that it is systematically different from the ] being estimated. The following lists some types of biases, which can overlap. |
|
such a way that it is systematically different from the ] being estimated. The following lists some types of biases, which can overlap. |
|
*] involves individuals being more likely to be selected for study than others, ]. This can also be termed ''Berksonian bias''.<ref>Rothman, K.J. ''et al.'' (2008) ''Modern Epidemiology'' (]) pp.134-137.</ref> |
|
*] involves individuals being more likely to be selected for study than others, ]. This can also be termed ''Berksonian bias''.<ref>{{cite book |last=Rothman |first=Kenneth J. |author-link1=Kenneth Rothman (epidemiologist) |first2=Sander |last2=Greenland |author-link2=Sander Greenland |first3=Timothy L. |last3=Lash |year=2008 |title=Modern Epidemiology |publisher=] |pp=134-137 }}</ref> |
|
**] arises from evaluating diagnostic tests on biased patient samples, leading to an overestimate of the ] of the test. |
|
**] arises from evaluating diagnostic tests on biased patient samples, leading to an overestimate of the ] of the test. |
|
* The ] is the difference between an estimator's expected value and the true value of the parameter being estimated. |
|
* The ] is the difference between an estimator's expected value and the true value of the parameter being estimated. |
|
** ] is the bias that appears in estimates of parameters in regression analysis when the assumed specification omits an independent variable that should be in the model. |
|
** ] is the bias that appears in estimates of parameters in regression analysis when the assumed specification omits an independent variable that should be in the model. |
|
* In ], a test is said to be '''unbiased''' if, for some alpha level (between 0 and 1), the probability the null is rejected is less than or equal to the alpha level for the entire parameter space defined by the null hypothesis, while the probability the null is rejected is greater than or equal to the alpha level for the entire parameter space defined by the alternative hypothesis.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Neyman|first1=J|last2=Pearson|first2=E S|title=Contributions to the theory of testing statistical hypotheses|journal=Stat. Res. Mem.|date=1936|volume=1|pages=1–37}}</ref> |
|
* In ], a test is said to be '''unbiased''' if, for some alpha level (between 0 and 1), the probability the null is rejected is less than or equal to the alpha level for the entire parameter space defined by the null hypothesis, while the probability the null is rejected is greater than or equal to the alpha level for the entire parameter space defined by the alternative hypothesis.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Neyman |first1=Jerzy |author-link1=Jerzy Neyman |last2=Pearson |first2=Egon S. |author-link2=Egon Pearson |title=Contributions to the theory of testing statistical hypotheses |journal=Statistical Research Memoirs |year=1936 |volume=1 |pages=1–37 |url=https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1936-05541-001 }}</ref> |
|
* Detection bias occurs when a phenomenon is more likely to be observed for a particular set of study subjects. For instance, the ] involving ] and ] may mean doctors are more likely to look for diabetes in obese patients than in thinner patients, leading to an inflation in diabetes among obese patients because of skewed detection efforts. |
|
* Detection bias occurs when a phenomenon is more likely to be observed for a particular set of study subjects. For instance, the ] involving ] and ] may mean doctors are more likely to look for diabetes in obese patients than in thinner patients, leading to an inflation in diabetes among obese patients because of skewed detection efforts. |
|
* In ], bias is defined as "Systematic errors in test content, test administration, and/or scoring procedures that can cause some test takers to get either lower or higher scores than their true ability would merit. The source of the bias is irrelevant to the trait the test is intended to measure." <ref>National Council on Measurement in Education http://www.ncme.org/ncme/NCME/Resource_Center/Glossary/NCME/Resource_Center/Glossary1.aspx?hkey=4bb87415-44dc-4088-9ed9-e8515326a061#anchorB {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170722194028/http://www.ncme.org/ncme/NCME/Resource_Center/Glossary/NCME/Resource_Center/Glossary1.aspx?hkey=4bb87415-44dc-4088-9ed9-e8515326a061#anchorB |date=2017-07-22 }}</ref> |
|
* In ], bias is defined as "Systematic errors in test content, test administration, and/or scoring procedures that can cause some test takers to get either lower or higher scores than their true ability would merit. The source of the bias is irrelevant to the trait the test is intended to measure." <ref>{{cite web |author=National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) |author-link=National Council on Measurement in Education |url=http://www.ncme.org/ncme/NCME/Resource_Center/Glossary/NCME/Resource_Center/Glossary1.aspx?hkey=4bb87415-44dc-4088-9ed9-e8515326a061#anchorB<!-- now at https://www.ncme.org/resources/glossary --> |title=NCME Assessment Glossary |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170722194028/http://www.ncme.org/ncme/NCME/Resource_Center/Glossary/NCME/Resource_Center/Glossary1.aspx?hkey=4bb87415-44dc-4088-9ed9-e8515326a061#anchorB |archive-date=2017-07-22 }}</ref> |
|
* ] may lead to the selection of outcomes, test samples, or test procedures that favor a study's financial sponsor. |
|
* ] may lead to the selection of outcomes, test samples, or test procedures that favor a study's financial sponsor. |
|
* ] involves a skew in the availability of data, such that observations of a certain kind are more likely to be reported. |
|
* ] involves a skew in the availability of data, such that observations of a certain kind are more likely to be reported. |
|
* Analytical bias arises due to the way that the results are evaluated. |
|
* Analytical bias arises due to the way that the results are evaluated. |
|
* ] arise due to the systematic exclusion of certain individuals from the study. |
|
* ] arise due to the systematic exclusion of certain individuals from the study. |
|
* ] arises due to a loss of participants e.g. loss to follow up during a study.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Higgins|first1=Julian PT|last2=Green|first2=Sally|title=Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions|date=March 2011|publisher=The Cochrane Collaboration|url=http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_8/8_4_introduction_to_sources_of_bias_in_clinical_trials.htm}}</ref> |
|
* ] arises due to a loss of participants e.g. loss to follow up during a study.<ref>{{cite book |editor-last1=Higgins |editor-first1=Julian P. T. |display-editors=etal |last1=Higgins |first1=Julian P. T. |author-link1=Julian Higgins |last2=Green |first2=Sally |title=Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1) |date=March 2011 |publisher=The Cochrane Collaboration |url=http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_8/8_4_introduction_to_sources_of_bias_in_clinical_trials.htm |chapter=8. Introduction to sources of bias in clinical trials }}</ref> |
|
* ] arises due to differences in the accuracy or completeness of participant recollections of past events. e.g. a patient cannot recall how many cigarettes they smoked last week exactly, leading to over-estimation or under-estimation. |
|
* ] arises due to differences in the accuracy or completeness of participant recollections of past events. e.g. a patient cannot recall how many cigarettes they smoked last week exactly, leading to over-estimation or under-estimation. |
|
* ] arises when the researcher subconsciously influences the experiment due to ] where judgment may alter how an experiment is carried out / how results are recorded. |
|
* ] arises when the researcher subconsciously influences the experiment due to ] where judgment may alter how an experiment is carried out / how results are recorded. |