Revision as of 22:15, 24 February 2020 editJoeyconnick (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers71,095 edits →References← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:18, 24 February 2020 edit undoJoeyconnick (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers71,095 edits add auto-archivingNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | ||
{{WikiProject Trains|class=start}} | {{WikiProject Trains|class=start}} | ||
Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
{{WikiProject Bridges|class=start|importance=Low}} | {{WikiProject Bridges|class=start|importance=Low}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{reqmapin|British Columbia}} | {{reqmapin|British Columbia}} | ||
<div style="background-color: clear;border:2px solid green;padding:10px;text-align:center"><font color=green>'''Archives: '''</font>]</div> | |||
<br> | |||
{{oldpeerreview}} | {{oldpeerreview}} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| algo = old(180d) | |||
| archive = Talk:Skybridge (TransLink)/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| counter = 1 | |||
| maxarchivesize = 50K | |||
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | |||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| minthreadsleft = 4 | |||
}} | |||
{{Auto archiving notice |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=6 |units=months}} | |||
==Skybridge Photos== | ==Skybridge Photos== | ||
There were complaints about the existing Skybridge image. I took several photos of the Skybridge and made them freely available via ] at . -- ] 23:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC) | There were complaints about the existing Skybridge image. I took several photos of the Skybridge and made them freely available via ] at . -- ] 23:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:18, 24 February 2020
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Skybridge (TransLink) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in British Columbia may be able to help! |
Skybridge (TransLink) received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Skybridge (TransLink) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
Skybridge Photos
There were complaints about the existing Skybridge image. I took several photos of the Skybridge and made them freely available via Flickr at VancouverBCSkybridge. -- 154.20.235.123 23:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
And an actual train travelling over the bridge as well! I must admit, the women did put a smile on my face! 192.30.202.28 15:30, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Citations
Needs cleanup, since at the end of every single sentence there is a 'citation needed' warning
- Every single one of those statements needs a citation. I'd put a "This article needs citations" message up and do away with all the "citation needed" tags, but someone removed that very same message before, and I'm not in the mood for a revert war. Anonymous 57 07:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Three points:
- Most of the things listed here are common knowledge and thus don't need a citation. See WP:CITE.
- Adding {{cn}} to every sentence in an article can be considered to be disrupting Misplaced Pages to make a point, which is strongly discouraged.
- I admire your goal of making Misplaced Pages better referenced, but the best way to do that is to jump in and find references for topics that you know about, not adding {{cn}} to everything. Even for something like this, you shouldn't have a big problem finding citations online.
- Anyway, I've rolled back your edit. JYolkowski // talk 02:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Three points:
Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Misplaced Pages. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/vancouver/vancouver3.html
- Triggered by
\brailway-technology\.com\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II Online 11:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II Online 20:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation
@Joeyconnick: SkyBridge (British Columbia) or SkyBridge (Metro Vancouver)?
I don't know if the dab for this article necessarily needs to match that of TransLink (British Columbia) given that it's about transit infrastructure and not transit service. Given that Template:Bridges of Metro Vancouver is embedded at the bottom of the page, I don't think too many readers would be confused to where "Metro Vancouver" is and "Vancouver" alone has huge name recognition. Previous discussion —Northwest (talk) 04:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Was there a request to move the article? I don't think it's necessary. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:07, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Walter Görlitz I think it stems from the notion that "(TransLink)" is not a super-recognizable terms outside transit circles or Lower Mainland locals.
- @Northwest: well unsurprisingly I haven't changed my mind re: "Metro Vancouver". I would rather move the template to "Bridges of Greater Vancouver", honestly, and go with "SkyBridge (Greater Vancouver)". But of the two, I think "SkyBridge (British Columbia)" is best... yes, both New West and Surrey are in Metro/Greater Vancouver but again, if we're going by something similar to CANSTATION, province makes the most sense if city doesn't work. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- The thought of a reader having an issue differentiate between "Metro Vancouver" and "Greater Vancouver" hadn't crossed my mind earlier. On second thought, yeah, "British Columbia" is the better dab. When following WP:CANSTATION; shouldn't SkyTrain (Vancouver) instead be SkyTrain (British Columbia) or could the dab be dropped altogether if there's a case for it? —Northwest (talk) 17:50, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
References
@Joeyconnick: I had incorrectly assumed it was blatantly obvious to anyone who had bothered to read the references that they were not added to verify the name of a bridge, but as an early reliable source for a contributor to use when undertaking the next major redraft of this page. Naturally, such a person would be shuffling around all existing and later references accordingly, rather than myself, since the subject is not within my ambit of interests.DMBanks1 (talk) 15:53, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- We don't add WP:OVERREFs to an article when {{refideas}} exist. When no edit summary other than " add references", it looked to me as though it was the addition of references as well. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:56, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- @DMBanks1: a (much) better place for references like that is the article's talk page, not cluttering up the first sentence of the article. I think there's even a template for "potentially useful in the future references". —Joeyconnick (talk) 22:15, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class rail transport articles
- Unknown-importance rail transport articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class British Columbia articles
- Low-importance British Columbia articles
- Start-Class Vancouver articles
- Mid-importance Vancouver articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles
- Low-importance Bridge and Tunnel articles
- WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels articles
- Misplaced Pages requested maps in British Columbia
- Old requests for peer review