Misplaced Pages

User talk:The Behnam: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:02, 14 December 2006 editKendrick7 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,315 edits Deleting sourced info from article← Previous edit Revision as of 10:35, 14 December 2006 edit undoPaul Barlow (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers93,539 edits WINNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


Just because a reference link goes bad, it doesn't mean its OK to just delete material. That kind of thing happens from time to time. You should ]. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 02:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC) Just because a reference link goes bad, it doesn't mean its OK to just delete material. That kind of thing happens from time to time. You should ]. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 02:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

==WIN==
I'm afraid that the prospect of getting a coherent, on-topic discussion with WIN is remote. He is, essentially a "fudamentalist" who believes that Sanskrit is the origin of all IE languages (at least he appears to believe that. It's often difficult to penetrate his meaning). ] 10:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:35, 14 December 2006

Deleting sourced info from article

Please don't delete sourced information from International Conference to Review the Global Vision of the Holocaust. It is considered valdalism. -- Kendrick7 09:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Just removing warning in accordance with our discussion on the article talk page. Cheers. Jeffpw 23:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Just because a reference link goes bad, it doesn't mean its OK to just delete material. That kind of thing happens from time to time. You should WP:AGF. -- Kendrick7 02:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

WIN

I'm afraid that the prospect of getting a coherent, on-topic discussion with WIN is remote. He is, essentially a "fudamentalist" who believes that Sanskrit is the origin of all IE languages (at least he appears to believe that. It's often difficult to penetrate his meaning). Paul B 10:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)