Revision as of 02:02, 14 December 2006 editKendrick7 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,315 edits →Deleting sourced info from article← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:35, 14 December 2006 edit undoPaul Barlow (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers93,539 edits WINNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Just because a reference link goes bad, it doesn't mean its OK to just delete material. That kind of thing happens from time to time. You should ]. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 02:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | Just because a reference link goes bad, it doesn't mean its OK to just delete material. That kind of thing happens from time to time. You should ]. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 02:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
==WIN== | |||
I'm afraid that the prospect of getting a coherent, on-topic discussion with WIN is remote. He is, essentially a "fudamentalist" who believes that Sanskrit is the origin of all IE languages (at least he appears to believe that. It's often difficult to penetrate his meaning). ] 10:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:35, 14 December 2006
Deleting sourced info from article
Please don't delete sourced information from International Conference to Review the Global Vision of the Holocaust. It is considered valdalism. -- Kendrick7 09:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Just removing warning in accordance with our discussion on the article talk page. Cheers. Jeffpw 23:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Just because a reference link goes bad, it doesn't mean its OK to just delete material. That kind of thing happens from time to time. You should WP:AGF. -- Kendrick7 02:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
WIN
I'm afraid that the prospect of getting a coherent, on-topic discussion with WIN is remote. He is, essentially a "fudamentalist" who believes that Sanskrit is the origin of all IE languages (at least he appears to believe that. It's often difficult to penetrate his meaning). Paul B 10:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)