Misplaced Pages

User talk:Irishpunktom: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:09, 14 December 2006 editIrishpunktom (talk | contribs)9,733 editsm Blocked for 48 hours← Previous edit Revision as of 20:13, 14 December 2006 edit undoIrishpunktom (talk | contribs)9,733 editsm Blocked for 48 hoursNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:
You have been blocked for 48 hours for your violation of of August 21, 2006. ] ] ] 21:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC) You have been blocked for 48 hours for your violation of of August 21, 2006. ] ] ] 21:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


{{unblock|Not reverts, just new edits, does not contravene the arb-com ruling)) {{unblock|Not reverts, just new edits, does not contravene the arb-com ruling}}


==Unspecified source for Image:Timur with babur and Humayun.jpg== ==Unspecified source for Image:Timur with babur and Humayun.jpg==

Revision as of 20:13, 14 December 2006

Muhammad mediation

Hey there, I need to know if you plan to continue participating in the mediation at Talk:Muhammad/Mediation. We need to move forward, which means we need to address your proposed criteria change. Currently, 2 people support, 4 oppose, and 1 is neutral. You need to either come discuss your position, or the proposal will be tabled. Thanks --Ars Scriptor 14:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Irish History

You seem like you have a lot a knowledge with respect Irish history so maybe you would like to comment on the historic basis of this term here Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-02 IRA 'Volunteer' usage

Hurry brothter

I feel really good to see your contribution in Muhammad article. My dear brother, leaving will not make things better. Even if wikipedia become more worst then what it is now. We should still not leave it and work to make whatever difference we can make. Let me hug my brave brother and welcome back. --- ALM 11:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back

--BostonMA 12:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

IPT, not sure if you're around but you're probably about to be be blocked for 3RR... not sure what you can do to prevent that... but if there's something ... you'd better do it promptly. (Netscott) 20:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for 48 hours

You have been blocked for 48 hours for your violation of the ArbCom decision of August 21, 2006. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 21:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Irishpunktom (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Not reverts, just new edits, does not contravene the arb-com ruling

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Not reverts, just new edits, does not contravene the arb-com ruling |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Not reverts, just new edits, does not contravene the arb-com ruling |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Not reverts, just new edits, does not contravene the arb-com ruling |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Unspecified source for Image:Timur with babur and Humayun.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Timur with babur and Humayun.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Misplaced Pages (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 18:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Category: