| Revision as of 05:54, 14 December 2006 editDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:17, 15 December 2006 edit undoDavidpdx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,793 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| * '''Delete''' per arguements above & per nom. -]<small>(]·]·])</small> 01:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' per arguements above & per nom. -]<small>(]·]·])</small> 01:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''reluctant delete''' its a small academic society, not a vanity press, but it does not seem to have actually put out much in the way of publication & its websites didnt work. ] 05:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''reluctant delete''' its a small academic society, not a vanity press, but it does not seem to have actually put out much in the way of publication & its websites didnt work. ] 05:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' ] 09:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:17, 15 December 2006
Journal of Joan of Arc Studies
- Journal of Joan of Arc Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
This journal's publisher appears to be a vanity press rather than a legitimate academic organization. In addition, according to WorldCat, the journal is not held by any libraries, and as far as I can tell has published only one issue (or perhaps none). The publication doesn't appear to be notable. --Akhilleus (talk) 03:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. MER-C 03:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. 2 of 4 sources are it's own materials; 1 is dead; other is useless to prove notablity. SkierRMH,09:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Bec-Thorn-Berry 11:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Jefferson Anderson 17:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, at least until this Journal gains some reputation in the field as a reliable peer-reviewed journal.-- danntm C 00:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete fails Misplaced Pages:Notability (books).--Dakota 00:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per arguements above & per nom. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 01:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- reluctant delete its a small academic society, not a vanity press, but it does not seem to have actually put out much in the way of publication & its websites didnt work. DGG 05:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Davidpdx 09:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)