User talk:Eternal Father: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:05, 19 April 2020 editBilorv (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers38,699 edits declined (AFCH 0.9.1)← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:35, 19 April 2020 edit undoDoug Weller (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators264,006 edits Adding Discretionary Sanctions Notice (ap) (TW)Tag: contentious topics alert Next edit →
Line 53:		Line 53:

	— ] (''']''') 00:05, 19 April 2020 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->		— ] (''']''') 00:05, 19 April 2020 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->
			==Important Notice==
			{{ivmbox \| image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg \|imagesize=50px \| bg = #E5F8FF \| text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

			You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic.

			For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
			}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] ] 09:35, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:35, 19 April 2020

This is Eternal Father's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hoaxed (2019 Film) (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was: This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission. The comment the reviewer left was: The article is about a film that lacks important DETAILED information about Plot, Cast, Production, Release, Reception and Accolades(if any). The data provided in infobox is not sufficient. For example see the writing style and structure of a documentaries like The Great Hack and Human Flow Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hoaxed (2019 Film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hoaxed (2019 Film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Amkgp (talk) 14:53, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Eternal Father! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Amkgp (talk) 14:53, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions

Due to past disruptive behavior, Roger Stone is under discretionary sanctions. Per Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, edits to this article include special restrictions. When editing that article, a banner is shown across the top which explains this. Per that banner, If an edit you make is reverted you must discuss on the talk page and wait 24 hours before reinstating your edit. I encourage you to self-revert your edit and start a discussion on the article's talk page. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 23:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Roger Stone shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in being blocked from editing—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Your understanding or lack thereof isn't my problem: that the article is under discretionary sanctions with the one-revert rule in effect is yours. Try that again and you can be blocked. --Calton | Talk 23:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

It's been posted to the talk page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hoaxed (2019 Film) (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bilorv were: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages.This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. The comment the reviewer left was: Article is about a fringe political topic but makes no mention that many figures involved in the film are conspiracy theorists (e.g. Alex Jones, James O'Keefe) and alt-right. It uses unreliable sources such as The Daily Wire (see WP:RSP). The film may be notable but there are also big neutrality problems here. Sentences such as "despite being inexplicably removed from Amazon Prime Video" make it clear the author has something to hide. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hoaxed (2019 Film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hoaxed (2019 Film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 00:05, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 09:35, 19 April 2020 (UTC)