| Revision as of 05:02, 8 April 2020 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,296,130 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Conservatism/Archive 13) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:45, 24 April 2020 edit undoEternal Father (talk | contribs)193 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit → | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| Hey awhile ago I came across a thread started by another user on ]'s talk page with regard to "bias". I tried to support the point with a citation from PragerU, stating "Thousands of educators and university professors utilize PragerU videos as teaching supplements in their classrooms; with over 3 billion video views, they are a prominent source of conservative information." From my perspective, PragerU meets the ] and ] guidelines; but other editors have commented that PragerU lacks fact checking and accuracy, is not a reliable source, and therefore cannot be used. Has anybody run into this problem before? If you could visit the talk page and put in your thoughts. --] (]) 02:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC) | Hey awhile ago I came across a thread started by another user on ]'s talk page with regard to "bias". I tried to support the point with a citation from PragerU, stating "Thousands of educators and university professors utilize PragerU videos as teaching supplements in their classrooms; with over 3 billion video views, they are a prominent source of conservative information." From my perspective, PragerU meets the ] and ] guidelines; but other editors have commented that PragerU lacks fact checking and accuracy, is not a reliable source, and therefore cannot be used. Has anybody run into this problem before? If you could visit the talk page and put in your thoughts. --] (]) 02:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
| ==Assessment request for ]== | |||
| {{pagelinks|Hoaxed}} | |||
| * Documentary film about fake news and media bias against conservative viewpoints ] (]) 20:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:45, 24 April 2020
WikiProject Conservatism
Discussion
Alerts
Assessment
Showcase
Resources
Have a question? Just ask
Archives
ShortcutWelcome to the Discussion page for WikiProject Conservatism. Here you can find discussions, notices, and requests for articles that deal with conservatism. If you would like to discuss, place a notice about, or if you have a request about, an article within the scope of this project, please include it here. Note that posting here in order to try to recruit editors with a particular political point of view is contrary to the intent of this project. Make sure to keep up-to-date on happenings at the project Watch
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Assessment request for U.S. presidential impeachment
U.S. presidential impeachment (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
National Association of Scholars - Your thoughts requested on Talk page
I created a section on Talk:National Association of Scholars titled, NPOV January 2020. Would you share your thoughts on the article there? (Or edit the article to improve it.) ¶ I read a Commentary in the Wall Street Journal Opinion section today that included this sentence: "Misplaced Pages describes us as a 'conservative' organization." That mention prompted me to look at the article. I did not know about the National Association of Scholars before today. I reviewed other Misplaced Pages articles about nonprofit (or trade union) educational organizations and none of them used an adjective denoting a political ideology in the article's short description or in the lede (introductory paragraph). Calling the National Association of Scholars a "conservative" organization struck me as neither consistent nor neutral. What do you think? (Please discuss at Talk:National Association of Scholars#NPOV January 2020—not here—so we're all on the same page.) Thanks! ¶ Citation: Peter W. Wood, "‘Cancel Culture’ Comes to Science", Wall Street Journal (January 13, 2020): A17. - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.) 11:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
RfC on political party of David Clarke (sheriff)
Please see here: Talk:David Clarke (sheriff)#RfC on political party. Your opinion is appreciated. Jauerback/dude. 01:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
PragerU being rejected as a reliable source - Your thoughts requested on talk page
Hey awhile ago I came across a thread started by another user on Turning Point USA's talk page with regard to "bias". I tried to support the point with a citation from PragerU, stating "Thousands of educators and university professors utilize PragerU videos as teaching supplements in their classrooms; with over 3 billion video views, they are a prominent source of conservative information." From my perspective, PragerU meets the WP:VERIFY and WP:RS guidelines; but other editors have commented that PragerU lacks fact checking and accuracy, is not a reliable source, and therefore cannot be used. Has anybody run into this problem before? If you could visit the talk page and put in your thoughts. --MaximusEditor (talk) 02:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Assessment request for Hoaxed
Hoaxed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Documentary film about fake news and media bias against conservative viewpoints Eternal Father (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)