Misplaced Pages

Mansplaining: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:42, 5 May 2020 editGirth Summit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators98,482 edits Reverted 1 edit by Sleyece (talk): No deletion discussion seems to have been created. (TW)Tag: Undo← Previous edit Revision as of 04:42, 10 May 2020 edit undo46.97.170.78 (talk) Removed blatant anti-feminist agenda pushing. Save it for Conservapedia, not a serious site like this one.Tag: references removedNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:
In 2013 ] said it was adding both ''mansplain'' and the suffix (libfix) ''-splain'' to its dictionary.<ref name=dictionary.com>{{cite web|last1=Solomon|first1=Jane|title=Word Watch 2013: -splain|url=http://blog.dictionary.com/splain/|publisher=Dictionary.com|accessdate=24 November 2014|date=6 December 2013|quote=The possibilities are seeming endless on the -splain front. This gives Dictionary.com reason to believe that -splain is not just a temporary fad, but rather a stable new addition to English along with its libfix cousins like ''-gate'', ''-pocalypse'', and ''-zilla''.}}</ref> Its announcement read in part: "In addition to being creative, this term, particularly the ''-splaining'' part, has proven to be incredibly robust and useful as a combining form in 2013." Dictionary.com noted that the meaning of ''mansplain'' had changed somewhat since 2009, from "intense and serious to casual and jocular", while older ''-splain'' words still have "heavy cultural and political connotations and are often added to the names of politicians".<ref name=dictionary.com/> In 2013 ] said it was adding both ''mansplain'' and the suffix (libfix) ''-splain'' to its dictionary.<ref name=dictionary.com>{{cite web|last1=Solomon|first1=Jane|title=Word Watch 2013: -splain|url=http://blog.dictionary.com/splain/|publisher=Dictionary.com|accessdate=24 November 2014|date=6 December 2013|quote=The possibilities are seeming endless on the -splain front. This gives Dictionary.com reason to believe that -splain is not just a temporary fad, but rather a stable new addition to English along with its libfix cousins like ''-gate'', ''-pocalypse'', and ''-zilla''.}}</ref> Its announcement read in part: "In addition to being creative, this term, particularly the ''-splaining'' part, has proven to be incredibly robust and useful as a combining form in 2013." Dictionary.com noted that the meaning of ''mansplain'' had changed somewhat since 2009, from "intense and serious to casual and jocular", while older ''-splain'' words still have "heavy cultural and political connotations and are often added to the names of politicians".<ref name=dictionary.com/>


Mansplaining has also engendered parallel constructions such as ''womansplaining'', ''whitesplaining'', ''rightsplaining'',<ref name="american speech">{{cite journal | url=http://americanspeech.dukejournals.org/content/87/2/190.full.pdf+html | title=Among The New Words | last=Zimmer |first=Benjamin |last2=Carson |first2=Charles C. | journal=American Speech | year=2013 | volume=88 | issue=2 | pages=196–214 | doi=10.1215/00031283-2346771}}{{subscription required}}</ref> and ''Damonsplaining''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-34251224 |title='Damonsplaining': Matt Damon accused of insensitivity |publisher=BBC News |date=16 September 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first=Justin Wm. |last=Moyer |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/09/29/matt-damon-has-more-damonsplaining-to-do-this-time-about-alleged-anti-gay-comments/ |title=Matt Damon has more 'Damonsplaining' to do — this time about alleged anti-gay comments |work=The Washington Post |date=29 September 2015}}</ref> In November 2017 Dr. Jennifer Gunter suggested in ''The New York Times'' that the collective noun ''rash'' be used for mansplainers, as in "a rash of mansplainers", partly because "n medicine a rash can be a mild annoyance that goes away and never returns."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/style/my-vagina-is-terrific-your-opinion-about-it-is-not.html|title=My Vagina Is Terrific. Your Opinion About It Is Not.|last=Gunter|first=Jen|date=2017-11-16|work=The New York Times|access-date=2017-11-18|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Mansplaining has also engendered parallel constructions such as ''whitesplaining'', ''rightsplaining'',<ref name="american speech">{{cite journal | url=http://americanspeech.dukejournals.org/content/87/2/190.full.pdf+html | title=Among The New Words | last=Zimmer |first=Benjamin |last2=Carson |first2=Charles C. | journal=American Speech | year=2013 | volume=88 | issue=2 | pages=196–214 | doi=10.1215/00031283-2346771}}{{subscription required}}</ref> and ''Damonsplaining''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-34251224 |title='Damonsplaining': Matt Damon accused of insensitivity |publisher=BBC News |date=16 September 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first=Justin Wm. |last=Moyer |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/09/29/matt-damon-has-more-damonsplaining-to-do-this-time-about-alleged-anti-gay-comments/ |title=Matt Damon has more 'Damonsplaining' to do — this time about alleged anti-gay comments |work=The Washington Post |date=29 September 2015}}</ref> In November 2017 Dr. Jennifer Gunter suggested in ''The New York Times'' that the collective noun ''rash'' be used for mansplainers, as in "a rash of mansplainers", partly because "n medicine a rash can be a mild annoyance that goes away and never returns."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/style/my-vagina-is-terrific-your-opinion-about-it-is-not.html|title=My Vagina Is Terrific. Your Opinion About It Is Not.|last=Gunter|first=Jen|date=2017-11-16|work=The New York Times|access-date=2017-11-18|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref>


== Criticism == == Criticism ==
MPR News Staff disputed the usefulness of the term.<ref name="mprnews">{{cite news|title=Do we need a different word for 'mansplaining'?|url=https://www.mprnews.org/story/2016/12/19/mansplaining-as-a-term|accessdate=11 August 2017|publisher=MPR News|date=December 19, 2016}}</ref> Given its gender-specific nature and negative connotation, Lesley Kinzel described it as inherently biased, ], dismissive, and a double standard.<ref name=Kinzel>{{cite news|title = Why You'll Never Hear Me Use the Term 'Mansplain'|date = 16 August 2012|url = http://www.xojane.com/issues/why-you-ll-never-hear-me-use-term-mansplain|last = Kinzel|first = Lesley|work = ]|accessdate = 22 August 2013|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130726031745/http://www.xojane.com/issues/why-you-ll-never-hear-me-use-term-mansplain|archive-date = 26 July 2013|url-status = dead}}</ref> In a 2016 ''Washington Post'' article, ] wrote that it is just one of a number of terms using "man" as a derogatory prefix, and that this convention is part of a "current cycle of ]".<ref>{{cite news|last1=Young|first1=Cathy|title=Feminists treat men badly. It's bad for feminism|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/06/30/feminists-treat-men-badly-its-bad-for-feminism|work=The Washington Post|date=30 June 2016|quote=Whatever the reasons for the current cycle of misandry — yes, that’s a word, derided but also adopted for ironic use by many feminists — its existence is quite real. Consider, for example, the number of neologisms that use “man” as a derogatory prefix and that have entered everyday media language: “mansplaining,” “manspreading” and “manterrupting."}}</ref> Meghan Daum, in a 2015 ''Los Angeles Times'' article, wrote that "To suggest that men are more qualified for the designation than women is not only sexist but almost as tone deaf as categorizing everything that a man says as mansplaining."<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-oe-daum-mansplaining-20150108-column.html|title=Mansplaining? Windbags come in both genders|last=Daum|first=Meghan|website=latimes.com|access-date=2018-08-20}}</ref> In 2014 Solnit herself said she had doubts about it: "t seems to me to go a little heavy on the idea that men are inherently flawed this way, rather than that some men explain things they shouldn't and don't hear things they should."<ref>{{cite book|last1=Solnit|first1=Rebecca|title=Men Explain Things to Me|date=2014|publisher=Haymarket Books|location=Chicago|page=14}}</ref> As the word became more popular, several commentators complained that misappropriation had diluted its original meaning.<ref name="Salon">{{cite news|last1=Hart|first1=Benjamin|title=RIP "mansplaining": How the Internet killed one of our most useful words|url=http://www.salon.com/2014/10/20/rip_mansplaining_how_the_internet_killed_one_of_our_most_useful_words/|accessdate=30 October 2014|work=]|date=20 October 2014}}</ref> Joshua Sealy-Harrington and Tom McLaughlin wrote in newspaper ''The Globe and Mail'' that the term has been used as an '']'' to silence debate.<ref name="globe">{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/arguments-should-not-be-silenced-because-of-their-authors-race-or-sex/article17956547/|title=Arguments should not be silenced because of their author's race or sex|last1=McLaughlin|first1=Tom|last2=Sealy-Harrington|first2=Joshua|work=The Globe and Mail|date=15 April 2014}}</ref> Former British member of parliament ] criticized the focus on mansplaining, noting progress on gender equality within her lifetime.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.itv.com/goodmorningbritain/news/ann-widdecombe-on-gender-debate-women-are-more-equal-now-than-ever-dvccgtp8-jx3znqvy|title=Ann Widdecombe on gender debate: 'Women are more equal now than ever'|publisher=}}</ref> MPR News Staff disputed the usefulness of the term.<ref name="mprnews">{{cite news|title=Do we need a different word for 'mansplaining'?|url=https://www.mprnews.org/story/2016/12/19/mansplaining-as-a-term|accessdate=11 August 2017|publisher=MPR News|date=December 19, 2016}}</ref> As the word became more popular, several commentators complained that misappropriation had diluted its original meaning.<ref name="Salon">{{cite news|last1=Hart|first1=Benjamin|title=RIP "mansplaining": How the Internet killed one of our most useful words|url=http://www.salon.com/2014/10/20/rip_mansplaining_how_the_internet_killed_one_of_our_most_useful_words/|accessdate=30 October 2014|work=]|date=20 October 2014}}</ref> Joshua Sealy-Harrington and Tom McLaughlin wrote in newspaper ''The Globe and Mail'' that the term has been used as an '']'' to silence debate.<ref name="globe">{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/arguments-should-not-be-silenced-because-of-their-authors-race-or-sex/article17956547/|title=Arguments should not be silenced because of their author's race or sex|last1=McLaughlin|first1=Tom|last2=Sealy-Harrington|first2=Joshua|work=The Globe and Mail|date=15 April 2014}}</ref>


== See also == == See also ==

Revision as of 04:42, 10 May 2020

Pejorative term

Mansplaining (a blend word of man and the informal form splaining of the gerund explaining) is a pejorative term meaning "(of a man) to comment on or explain something to a woman in a condescending, overconfident, and often inaccurate or oversimplified manner". Author Rebecca Solnit ascribes the phenomenon to a combination of "overconfidence and cluelessness". Lily Rothman, of The Atlantic, defines it as "explaining without regard to the fact that the explainee knows more than the explainer, often done by a man to a woman".

In its original use, mansplaining differed from other forms of condescension in that it is rooted in the assumption that a man is likely to be more knowledgeable than a woman. However, it has come to be used more broadly, often applied when a man takes a condescending tone in an explanation to anyone, regardless of the age or gender of the intended recipients: a "man 'splaining" can be delivered to any audience. In 2010, it was named by the New York Times as one of its "Words of the Year". American Dialect Society nominated Mansplaining as the “most creative” new word in 2012.

Origins

The verb splain has been in use for more than 200 years, originally as a colloquial pronunciation of the Late Middle English word explain. It came increasingly to refer to condescending or verbose explanations. The term mansplaining was inspired by an essay, "Men Explain Things to Me: Facts Didn't Get in Their Way", written by Rebecca Solnit and published on TomDispatch.com on 13 April 2008. In the essay, Solnit told an anecdote about a man at a party who said he had heard she had written some books. She began to talk about her most recent, on Eadweard Muybridge, whereupon the man cut her off and asked if she had "heard about the very important Muybridge book that came out this year"—not considering that it might be (as, in fact, it was) Solnit's book. Solnit did not use the word mansplaining in the essay, but she described the phenomenon as "something every woman knows".

A month later the word appeared in a comment on the social network LiveJournal. It became popular among feminist bloggers before entering mainstream commentary. The word was included in 2010 by the New York Times as one of its words of the year, nominated in 2012 for the American Dialect Society's "most creative word of the year" honor, and added in 2014 to the online Oxford Dictionaries.

Solnit later published Men Explain Things to Me (2014), a collection of seven essays on similar themes. Women, including professionals and experts, are routinely seen or treated as less credible than men, she wrote in the title essay, and their insights or even legal testimony are dismissed unless validated by a man. She argued that this was one symptom of a widespread phenomenon that "keeps women from speaking up and from being heard when they dare; that crushes young women into silence by indicating, the way harassment on the street does, that this is not their world. It trains us in self-doubt and self-limitation just as it exercises men's unsupported overconfidence."

In 2018, during a lecture at Moe's Books in Berkeley, California, Solnit said, “I’m falsely credited with coining the term ‘mansplaining’. It was a 2010 New York Times word of the year. I did not actually coin it. I was a bit ambivalent about the word because it seems a little bit more condemnatory of the male of the species than I ever wanted it to be.”

Usage

Journalists have used the word to describe the 2012 Republican presidential nominee, Mitt Romney; President Donald Trump; Governor of Texas Rick Perry; MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell; various characters on the HBO drama series The Newsroom; music executive Jimmy Iovine; Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull; actor Matt Damon; and consumer rights advocate Ralph Nader. In February 2016 the term sparked an argument between two members of a committee of the Australian Senate, when Labor senator Katy Gallagher told Communications Minister Mitch Fifield: "I love the mansplaining. I'm enjoying it."

In 2013 Dictionary.com said it was adding both mansplain and the suffix (libfix) -splain to its dictionary. Its announcement read in part: "In addition to being creative, this term, particularly the -splaining part, has proven to be incredibly robust and useful as a combining form in 2013." Dictionary.com noted that the meaning of mansplain had changed somewhat since 2009, from "intense and serious to casual and jocular", while older -splain words still have "heavy cultural and political connotations and are often added to the names of politicians".

Mansplaining has also engendered parallel constructions such as whitesplaining, rightsplaining, and Damonsplaining. In November 2017 Dr. Jennifer Gunter suggested in The New York Times that the collective noun rash be used for mansplainers, as in "a rash of mansplainers", partly because "n medicine a rash can be a mild annoyance that goes away and never returns."

Criticism

MPR News Staff disputed the usefulness of the term. As the word became more popular, several commentators complained that misappropriation had diluted its original meaning. Joshua Sealy-Harrington and Tom McLaughlin wrote in newspaper The Globe and Mail that the term has been used as an ad hominem to silence debate.

See also

References

  1. ^ 'Definition' Dictionary.com
  2. ^ Mansplaining, Merriam-Webster.com
  3. Steinmetz, Katy (18 November 2014). "Clickbait, Normcore, Mansplain: Runners-Up for Oxford's Word of the Year". Time. Retrieved 24 November 2014.
  4. ^ Zimmer, Ben (5 January 2013). "Tag, You're It! "Hashtag" Wins as 2012 Word of the Year". Visual Thesaurus. Retrieved 30 October 2014.
  5. Solnit, Rebecca (20 August 2012). "Men still explain things to me". In These Times. Retrieved 30 October 2014.
  6. ^ Rothman, Lily (1 November 2012). "A Cultural History of Mansplaining". The Atlantic. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
  7. Jaschik, Scott (16 October 2012). "Calling Out Academic 'Mansplaining'". Inside Higher Ed.
  8. ^ Sifton, Sam; Barrett, Grant (18 December 2010). "The Words of the Year". The New York Times.
  9. "American Dialect Society 2012 Words of the Year" (PDF). americandialect.org. 4 January 2013.
  10. Peters, Mark. "'Mansplaining' Spawns a New Suffix". Vocabulary.com.
  11. Solnit, Rebecca (13 April 2008). "Men Explain Things to Me: Facts Didn't Get in Their Way". TomDispatch, The Nation Institute.
  12. Solnit, Rebecca (13 April 2008). "Men who explain things". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 30 October 2014.
  13. Doyle, Sady (1 May 2014). "Mansplaining, Explained". In These Times. Retrieved 30 October 2014.
  14. "New words added to OxfordDictionaries.com today include binge-watch, cray, and vape". Oxforddictionaries.com. August 2014. Retrieved 30 October 2014.
  15. Lewis, Helen (4 July 2014). "The Essay That Launched the Term "Mansplaining"". The New Republic.
  16. Sonksen, Mike (11 June 2014). "On Rebecca Solnit's Men Explain Things to Me". Cultural Weekly.
  17. Solnit did not coin the term ‘mansplaining’ Financial Times
  18. Cogan, Marin (1 August 2012). "The Mittsplainer: An Alternate Theory of Mitt Romney's Gaffes". GQ. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
  19. Kaplan, Ilana (20 October 2018). "Stephen Colbert accuses Trump of trying to 'mansplain the Midterms' to female voters". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 23 August 2019.
  20. Weigel, David (27 June 2013). "Mansplaining the Mansplainer: Rick Perry's Accidental Abortion Honesty". Slate. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
  21. Ioffe, Julia (8 August 2013). "Dear Lawrence O'Donnell, Don't Mansplain to Me About Russia". The New Republic. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
  22. Stuever, Hank (11 July 2013). "'The Newsroom' vs. 'Honey Boo Boo': Which one really gives us more to think about?". The Washington Post. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
  23. Weigel, David (5 August 2013). "Trying to Tolerate The Newsroom, Week Four". Slate. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
  24. Greenwald, Andy (16 July 2013). "Death by Newsroom". Grantland. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
  25. "Dear Jimmy Iovine: Women Don't Need You to Mansplain Music to Them". Observer. 19 November 2015. Retrieved 20 December 2015.
  26. "PM accused of 'mansplaining' ... but what does it mean?". The Sydney Morning Herald. 16 September 2015. Retrieved 20 December 2015.
  27. "Matt Damon Mansplaining Diversity On 'Project Greenlight' Is Frustrating, But There Is A Silver Lining". www.bustle.com. Retrieved 20 December 2015.
  28. "Ralph Nader Mansplains Monetary Policy to Janet Yellen". Daily Intelligencer. Retrieved 20 December 2015.
  29. Ireland, Judith (11 February 2016). "'What?': Katy Gallagher explains mansplaining to Mitch Fifield during fiery estimates showdown". The Sydney Morning Herald.
  30. ^ Solomon, Jane (6 December 2013). "Word Watch 2013: -splain". Dictionary.com. Retrieved 24 November 2014. The possibilities are seeming endless on the -splain front. This gives Dictionary.com reason to believe that -splain is not just a temporary fad, but rather a stable new addition to English along with its libfix cousins like -gate, -pocalypse, and -zilla.
  31. Zimmer, Benjamin; Carson, Charles C. (2013). "Among The New Words". American Speech. 88 (2): 196–214. doi:10.1215/00031283-2346771.(subscription required)
  32. "'Damonsplaining': Matt Damon accused of insensitivity". BBC News. 16 September 2015.
  33. Moyer, Justin Wm. (29 September 2015). "Matt Damon has more 'Damonsplaining' to do — this time about alleged anti-gay comments". The Washington Post.
  34. Gunter, Jen (16 November 2017). "My Vagina Is Terrific. Your Opinion About It Is Not". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 18 November 2017.
  35. "Do we need a different word for 'mansplaining'?". MPR News. 19 December 2016. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  36. Hart, Benjamin (20 October 2014). "RIP "mansplaining": How the Internet killed one of our most useful words". Salon. Retrieved 30 October 2014.
  37. McLaughlin, Tom; Sealy-Harrington, Joshua (15 April 2014). "Arguments should not be silenced because of their author's race or sex". The Globe and Mail.

External links

Categories: