| Revision as of 00:21, 6 December 2006 editJustforasecond (talk | contribs)2,975 edits can't go more than a few minutes without getting noticed around this place← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:17, 20 December 2006 edit undoThatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 edits Arb requestNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ] 21:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ] 21:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Arb request == | |||
| I think you have a misunderstanding about the sockpuppet, checkuser and privacy policies. There are many reasons that alternate accounts might be blocked, including trolling and other forms of disruption. Regardless, the accounts blocked by Jayjg need to be listed so that the arbitrators can evaluate the appropriateness of the individual blocks and use of checkuser. For example, if one account was being disruptive, this might justify a checkuser that would uncover the other accounts. On the other hand, if all the accounts were behaving within Misplaced Pages norms, there might be an argument that checkuser was inappropriate. It looks however, like they would prefer a direct complaint to arbcom-L at wikipedia dot org. ] 23:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:17, 20 December 2006
R E T I R E D]
Plenty of reasons why. Most of all, it just isn't fun anymore. I'll save the lengthy analysis of what is wrong with wikipedia for another time.
See yall round.
Justforasecond 21:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Arb request
I think you have a misunderstanding about the sockpuppet, checkuser and privacy policies. There are many reasons that alternate accounts might be blocked, including trolling and other forms of disruption. Regardless, the accounts blocked by Jayjg need to be listed so that the arbitrators can evaluate the appropriateness of the individual blocks and use of checkuser. For example, if one account was being disruptive, this might justify a checkuser that would uncover the other accounts. On the other hand, if all the accounts were behaving within Misplaced Pages norms, there might be an argument that checkuser was inappropriate. It looks however, like they would prefer a direct complaint to arbcom-L at wikipedia dot org. Thatcher131 23:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)