Misplaced Pages

User talk:C Colden: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:43, 15 December 2004 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:16, 19 December 2004 edit undoC Colden (talk | contribs)50 edits →Schiller InstituteNext edit →
Line 34: Line 34:
==Schiller Institute== ==Schiller Institute==
If you can source that Wills and Fourcade were there, by all means put it in. All I ask is that material be properly sourced. You are insane if you call my edit vandalism, and I mean that very sincerely and in the literal sense. I added just one sentence in the intro: that its critics regard the Institute as a political cult. In fact, that is more than fair, because it is so regarded by most people, not just its critics. I also moved your "history" to the end and recalled it "conferences" because it wasn't the history of the Institute, or anywhere near it. Stop your propaganda efforts or I will go back to the ArbCom and will formally request that they kick you out of Misplaced Pages or ask you to stop editing LaRouche articles, which would amount to the same thing because that's all you ever do. You shouldn't have anything to do with Misplaced Pages. Have you noticed that ALL your edits cause trouble? You are a poisonous troll. ] 19:31, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC) If you can source that Wills and Fourcade were there, by all means put it in. All I ask is that material be properly sourced. You are insane if you call my edit vandalism, and I mean that very sincerely and in the literal sense. I added just one sentence in the intro: that its critics regard the Institute as a political cult. In fact, that is more than fair, because it is so regarded by most people, not just its critics. I also moved your "history" to the end and recalled it "conferences" because it wasn't the history of the Institute, or anywhere near it. Stop your propaganda efforts or I will go back to the ArbCom and will formally request that they kick you out of Misplaced Pages or ask you to stop editing LaRouche articles, which would amount to the same thing because that's all you ever do. You shouldn't have anything to do with Misplaced Pages. Have you noticed that ALL your edits cause trouble? You are a poisonous troll. ] 19:31, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

:I'll say it again -- your childish personal attacks do not enhance your credibility. --] 17:16, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)


==READ these== ==READ these==

Revision as of 17:16, 19 December 2004

Welcome to the Misplaced Pages

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Misplaced Pages:Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam 15:01, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Herschelkrustofsky, C Colden and 64.30.208.48

After complaints to the Arbitration Committee Herschelkrustofsky, C Colden and 64.30.208.48 are banned for one week for violation of the provisions of Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Lyndon_LaRouche/Proposed_decision#Edit_wars_or_re-insertion_of_original_material. Effective November 25, 2004 on the vote of 5 arbitrators conducted at Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested.

Schiller Institute

If you can source that Wills and Fourcade were there, by all means put it in. All I ask is that material be properly sourced. You are insane if you call my edit vandalism, and I mean that very sincerely and in the literal sense. I added just one sentence in the intro: that its critics regard the Institute as a political cult. In fact, that is more than fair, because it is so regarded by most people, not just its critics. I also moved your "history" to the end and recalled it "conferences" because it wasn't the history of the Institute, or anywhere near it. Stop your propaganda efforts or I will go back to the ArbCom and will formally request that they kick you out of Misplaced Pages or ask you to stop editing LaRouche articles, which would amount to the same thing because that's all you ever do. You shouldn't have anything to do with Misplaced Pages. Have you noticed that ALL your edits cause trouble? You are a poisonous troll. Slim 19:31, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

I'll say it again -- your childish personal attacks do not enhance your credibility. --Caroline 17:16, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

READ these

Below are the principles and policies that all editors — including those editors, like yourself, who support or work for Lyndon LaRouche — must adhere to, with no exceptions.

Regarding novel narratives involving a new synthesis of information: "An article that makes no new low-level claims, but nonetheless synthesizes work in a non-standard way, is effectively original research that I think we ought not to publish. This comes up most often in history, where there is a tendency by some Wikipedians to produce novel narratives and historical interpretations with citation to primary sources to back up their interpretation of events. Even if their citations are accurate, Misplaced Pages's poorly equipped to judge whether their particular synthesis of the available information is a reasonable one," Jimbo Wales (WikiEN-l, Dec 6, 2004)