Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/StepMania: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:18, 26 December 2006 edit69.239.146.153 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 20:51, 26 December 2006 edit undoSPUI (talk | contribs)75,418 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
* '''Keep'''. I suppose after the recent spate of music-game-related AfDs (for example ], ], ], ]), this nomination was inevitable. Sorry, but StepMania is actually notable - not only has it provided the engine behind two rather successful arcade games that I know of (] 1 and 2), but the main version has been covered pretty often in media, as ] pointed out. &mdash; ] | ] 17:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC) * '''Keep'''. I suppose after the recent spate of music-game-related AfDs (for example ], ], ], ]), this nomination was inevitable. Sorry, but StepMania is actually notable - not only has it provided the engine behind two rather successful arcade games that I know of (] 1 and 2), but the main version has been covered pretty often in media, as ] pointed out. &mdash; ] | ] 17:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
* '''Keep'''. First and foremost, the Stepmania Engine was used in ITG 1 and 2, which were notable games. ] 19:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC) * '''Keep'''. First and foremost, the Stepmania Engine was used in ITG 1 and 2, which were notable games. ] 19:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
* that ] (a commercial success until Konami sued) is based on Stepmania. JJay's sources are probably enough for a decent stub. The current article needs pruning. --] (] - ]) 20:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:51, 26 December 2006

StepMania

StepMania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Not a notable bit of software. Given a {{prod}} tag, removed, given a {{More sources}} tag, removed, given a {{notability}} tag, nothing happens. Response to talk page request for sources was "o right ahead. Nominate it for deletion." Nothing to indicate that this meets the proposed inclusion guidleine for software by having "multiple non-trivial published works, which is also the hurdle for the accepted guidline on Notability linked before. Google News has one hit which is a trivial mention: One word in a list of other similare games, Google search has circa 5K hits, none of which appear to be non-trivial coverage from a reliable source. Delete unless citations provided to demostrate that this meets the existing (and proposed) inclusion guidelines. brenneman 06:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Categories: