| Revision as of 17:15, 11 July 2020 editGeneralrelative (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,193 edits →Early life and education: Added content on anthropology and genetics education; minor stylistic fixes.Tag: Visual edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:28, 12 July 2020 edit undoGeneralrelative (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,193 edits →Views: Minor grammar fix.Tag: Visual editNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| Marks' 2002 book ''What it Means to be 98% Chimpanzee'' argued that there is a significant gap between scientists' knowledge of genetics and their understanding of its functional significance.<ref name= ScholarsMedal/> In opposition to ], Marks explores evidence for synergy between genetic and cultural factors in shaping human traits such as body shape, school performance, athleticism, and even menstrual cycles.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Madrigal|first=Lorena|date=October 2002|title=Review: What it Means to Be 98% Chimpanzee: Apes, People, and Their Genes|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC529329/|journal=American Journal of Human Genetics|volume=71(4)|pages=1000-1001|via=}}</ref> | Marks' 2002 book ''What it Means to be 98% Chimpanzee'' argued that there is a significant gap between scientists' knowledge of genetics and their understanding of its functional significance.<ref name= ScholarsMedal/> In opposition to ], Marks explores evidence for synergy between genetic and cultural factors in shaping human traits such as body shape, school performance, athleticism, and even menstrual cycles.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Madrigal|first=Lorena|date=October 2002|title=Review: What it Means to Be 98% Chimpanzee: Apes, People, and Their Genes|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC529329/|journal=American Journal of Human Genetics|volume=71(4)|pages=1000-1001|via=}}</ref> | ||
| Marks published works include many scholarly articles and essays. He is an outspoken critic of ], and has prominently argued against the idea that "]" is a natural category. In Marks's view, "race" is a negotiation between patterns of ] variation and patterns of perceived difference. He argues that race and human diversity are different subjects, and do not map on to one another well.<ref name=ScholarsMedal></ref> | Marks' published works include many scholarly articles and essays. He is an outspoken critic of ], and has prominently argued against the idea that "]" is a natural category. In Marks's view, "race" is a negotiation between patterns of ] variation and patterns of perceived difference. He argues that race and human diversity are different subjects, and do not map on to one another well.<ref name=ScholarsMedal></ref> | ||
| As described in his book ''Is Science Racist?'', Marks considers science to have four epistemic qualities: ], ], ], and a primary value on accuracy.<ref name=Aero2019/> In this book and in ''Why I Am Not a Scientist'', he argues that anthropologists are ambiguously scientists.<ref name=Aero2019/> Rather, their purpose is to use both scientific and ] practice to understand the human condition.<ref name=Aero2019/> | As described in his book ''Is Science Racist?'', Marks considers science to have four epistemic qualities: ], ], ], and a primary value on accuracy.<ref name=Aero2019/> In this book and in ''Why I Am Not a Scientist'', he argues that anthropologists are ambiguously scientists.<ref name=Aero2019/> Rather, their purpose is to use both scientific and ] practice to understand the human condition.<ref name=Aero2019/> | ||
Revision as of 17:28, 12 July 2020
| Jonathan M. Marks | |
|---|---|
| Born | 1955 (age 68–69) |
| Nationality | American |
| Occupation | Anthropologist |
| Organization(s) | University of North Carolina at Charlotte Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism (Nixon, Nevada) |
| Awards | First Citizens Bank Scholars Medal |
Jonathan M. Marks (born 1955) is an American biological anthropologist at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He is a significant figure in anthropology, especially on the topic of race. Marks is skeptical of genetic explanations of human behavior, of "race" as a biological category, and of science as a rationalistic endeavor.
Early life and education
Born in 1955, Marks studied at the Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and took graduate degrees in genetics and anthropology from the University of Arizona, completing his doctorate in 1984.
Career
Marks did post-doctoral research in the genetics department at UC-Davis from 1984-1987, then taught at Yale for ten years and Berkeley for three, before settling in Charlotte where he is now a professor at the University of North Carolina-Charlotte.
When Marks was beginning his career, few anthropologists held degrees in genetics. The Charlotte Observer quotes him as saying, “Twenty-five years ago I was sort of avant garde. Now it’s much more common.”
Marks is a leading figure in anthropology, especially when it comes to public discussions of race. His work has been praised by such social scientists as Alondra Nelson, Agustín Fuentes, Barbara J. King, and Holly Dunsworth.
Marks has also served on the Board of Directors of the Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism, Nixon, Nevada.
In 2012, he received the First Citizens Bank Scholars Medal, honoring his career of intellectual inquiry.
Views
Marks' 2002 book What it Means to be 98% Chimpanzee argued that there is a significant gap between scientists' knowledge of genetics and their understanding of its functional significance. In opposition to biological determinism, Marks explores evidence for synergy between genetic and cultural factors in shaping human traits such as body shape, school performance, athleticism, and even menstrual cycles.
Marks' published works include many scholarly articles and essays. He is an outspoken critic of scientific racism, and has prominently argued against the idea that "race" is a natural category. In Marks's view, "race" is a negotiation between patterns of biological variation and patterns of perceived difference. He argues that race and human diversity are different subjects, and do not map on to one another well.
As described in his book Is Science Racist?, Marks considers science to have four epistemic qualities: naturalism, experimentalism, rationalism, and a primary value on accuracy. In this book and in Why I Am Not a Scientist, he argues that anthropologists are ambiguously scientists. Rather, their purpose is to use both scientific and humanistic practice to understand the human condition.
Bibliography
- Evolutionary Anthropology (1991, with Edward Staski) ISBN 978-0030237324
- Human Biodiversity (1995) ISBN 3-11-014855-2
- What It Means to be 98% Chimpanzee: Apes, People and their Genes (2002) ISBN 0-520-24064-2
- Why I Am Not a Scientist (2009) ISBN 0-520-25960-2
- The Alternative Introduction to Biological Anthropology (2010) ISBN 0-19-515703-6
- Tales of the Ex-Apes: How We Think about Human Evolution (2015) ISBN 0-52-028582-4
- Is Science Racist? (2017) ISBN 978-0-7456-8922-7
References
- ^ "Jonathan Marks honored by UNCC for anthropology work"
- ^ http://anthropology.uncc.edu/sites/anthropology.uncc.edu/files/media/JONCV.pdf
- ^ Moser, Cody. “Is Science Racist?” Book Review. Aero. 18 January 2019. Retrieved 11 July 2019.
- http://ipcb.org/
- Madrigal, Lorena (October 2002). "Review: What it Means to Be 98% Chimpanzee: Apes, People, and Their Genes". American Journal of Human Genetics. 71(4): 1000–1001.
External links
 | This article about an American anthropologist is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |