Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jacob Peters: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:45, 13 December 2006 editLuna Santin (talk | contribs)65,325 edits Archiving.← Previous edit Revision as of 23:18, 27 December 2006 edit undoTariqabjotu (talk | contribs)Administrators36,354 edits + new checkuser requestNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
=== Jacob Peters ===
* {{checkuser|Jacob Peters}}
<!-- Do not edit the top two lines. Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line -->
* {{checkuser|Iskra1}}
* {{checkip|68.127.37.13}}

* '''Code letter:''' F

I find by {{vandal|68.127.37.13}} oddly similar to by {{vandal|Iskra1}}, given they are writing about the same sentence and deriding Alan Bullock. Note that the IP was blocked as a sockpuppet of {{vandal|Jacob Peters}} (at least according to 68.127.37.13's block log). another comment by {{user|Iskra1}} that appears to take a position similar to that taken by {{user|68.127.37.13}} . edit by {{user|Iskra1}} is also a carbon-copy of by {{user|68.127.37.13}}. I, thus, feel convinced that {{user|Jacob Peters}} is once again evading a block through sockpuppetry. -- ''']''' 23:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
*I'm adding the IP address of {{user|68.127.37.13}} to confirm the block evasion allegation noted in the IP's block log. -- ''']''' 23:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

<noinclude> <noinclude>
<!-- <!--

Revision as of 23:18, 27 December 2006

Jacob Peters

  • Code letter: F

I find this comment by 68.127.37.13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) oddly similar to this comment by Iskra1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), given they are writing about the same sentence and deriding Alan Bullock. Note that the IP was blocked as a sockpuppet of Jacob Peters (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (at least according to 68.127.37.13's block log). Here's another comment by Iskra1 (talk · contribs) that appears to take a position similar to that taken by 68.127.37.13 (talk · contribs) here. This edit by Iskra1 (talk · contribs) is also a carbon-copy of this edit by 68.127.37.13 (talk · contribs). I, thus, feel convinced that Jacob Peters (talk · contribs) is once again evading a block through sockpuppetry. -- tariqabjotu 23:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jacob Peters}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Jacob Peters

  • Code letter: F

Otto Schmidt's controversial edit at Robert Conquest is almost identical of several Jacob Peters edits at same page. Jacob Peters is currently blocked for avoiding blocks and sockpuppeting. So I suspect sockpuppetry to avoid block again. Staberinde 20:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

 Confirmed. Essjay (Talk) 03:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.