Misplaced Pages

User talk:Cjr121: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:46, 28 December 2006 editCjr121 (talk | contribs)26 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 16:30, 28 December 2006 edit undoCjr121 (talk | contribs)26 edits Blanked the pageNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== Wiktionary ==

Wikitionary already has a definition of couth (. As for the essay part, that doesn't belong either here or there. ] 00:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages{{#if:Talk:Couth|, as you did to ]}}. It is considered ]. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test2a (Second level warning) -->

It won't help. ] 00:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

] 00:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Why must you be an ass. My article makes perfect sense. Just let it go.
:It's not an article. It's a bunch of your personal opinions about how the word can be used. Misplaced Pages is not for personal opinions. ] 00:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

] 00:46, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Actually its not opinions. Almost all of that article is about how the word '''IS''' used. Only a sentence or two is there on opinion. What is so wrong about adding a simple little opinion at the end of a hard cold facts. This site is huge. What is wrong with one little opinion comment on one little article??

Revision as of 16:30, 28 December 2006