Misplaced Pages

User talk:Doc glasgow: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:34, 28 December 2006 editWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Doc glasgow/Dec 06← Previous edit Revision as of 20:30, 28 December 2006 edit undoGiano II (talk | contribs)22,233 edits ChurchesNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:


I think the best idea would be to merge it into ], and redirect it there. LOCAL is mostly stable and focuses on merging rather than deletion. I don't think it's all that helpful to have WP:SUPERMARKET, WP:RESTAURANT, WP:CHURCH and WP:GAS_STATION and other subsections. Obviously is a church is large enough to be known outside its own city, people can't say "delete per WP:LOCAL". HTH! ] 09:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC) I think the best idea would be to merge it into ], and redirect it there. LOCAL is mostly stable and focuses on merging rather than deletion. I don't think it's all that helpful to have WP:SUPERMARKET, WP:RESTAURANT, WP:CHURCH and WP:GAS_STATION and other subsections. Obviously is a church is large enough to be known outside its own city, people can't say "delete per WP:LOCAL". HTH! ] 09:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


== FYI ==

Despite of your "IRC" opinion that I am "not worth it", It is only fair of me to give you notification of this edit of mine here , and chance to respond to it. I mention it only because the thread is now so long things are easily missed, and I never talk behind people's backs - a concept I don't expect you to understand. ] 20:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:30, 28 December 2006

User:Doc glasgow/tidy


User name created to Slur an individual

You visit the user page for Bruce cairney before and removed 'unhelpful comments' how about deleting the user completely it is obvoiusly only created to sling mud and BS —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.152.12.41 (talk) 09:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC).

Huh?

You posted the following on my talk page but it doesn't make any sense. I have no idea of which archive you are talking about or why/what was done. Could you educate me? Balloonman 14:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Churches

I think the best idea would be to merge it into WP:LOCAL, and redirect it there. LOCAL is mostly stable and focuses on merging rather than deletion. I don't think it's all that helpful to have WP:SUPERMARKET, WP:RESTAURANT, WP:CHURCH and WP:GAS_STATION and other subsections. Obviously is a church is large enough to be known outside its own city, people can't say "delete per WP:LOCAL". HTH! >Radiant< 09:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


FYI

Despite of your "IRC" opinion that I am "not worth it", It is only fair of me to give you notification of this edit of mine here , and chance to respond to it. I mention it only because the thread is now so long things are easily missed, and I never talk behind people's backs - a concept I don't expect you to understand. Giano 20:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)