| Revision as of 16:00, 26 January 2005 editDanielCD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users31,574 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:07, 26 January 2005 edit undoInShaneee (talk | contribs)15,956 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Hi there. About the ] article: I thought I had done enough looking around for a water hardness article, but who would have thought to look in the most obvious place (], Duh!). I'll work on merging the articles. Which title do you think is better: Hard water or Water hardness? --] 16:00, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC) | Hi there. About the ] article: I thought I had done enough looking around for a water hardness article, but who would have thought to look in the most obvious place (], Duh!). I'll work on merging the articles. Which title do you think is better: Hard water or Water hardness? --] 16:00, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *I'd suggest keeping the name hard water, firstly because that's how most people know it as (IMHO), and secondly because it seems to describe the broader topic, while water hardness sounds like a measure of hard water itself. --] 16:07, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:07, 26 January 2005
Hi there. About the Water hardness article: I thought I had done enough looking around for a water hardness article, but who would have thought to look in the most obvious place (Hard water, Duh!). I'll work on merging the articles. Which title do you think is better: Hard water or Water hardness? --DanielCD 16:00, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- I'd suggest keeping the name hard water, firstly because that's how most people know it as (IMHO), and secondly because it seems to describe the broader topic, while water hardness sounds like a measure of hard water itself. --InShaneee 16:07, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)