| Revision as of 03:17, 29 December 2006 editDev920 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers11,497 edits →Mark as historical rather than delete: reply.← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:27, 29 December 2006 edit undoCarcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,578 edits →Mark as historical rather than delete: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| ] 03:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ] 03:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I think people are going to to be able to learn what they need to from the MfDs... ] (Have a nice day!) 03:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | :I think people are going to to be able to learn what they need to from the MfDs... ] (Have a nice day!) 03:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::Maybe. Maybe not. I agree with Kim. Mark as historical. Don't delete stuff that has a history. ] 04:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:27, 29 December 2006
No more co-noms, please. 2 is quite enough, though thanks to Ed for adding his relevant and accurate summary. Just vote. Moreschi 22:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. You could just as easily post a long deletion vote. DoomsDay349 22:39, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Section?
As I think much of the debate is going to center around delete v. some sort of historical preservation, I will create a subsection for this discussion unless anyone objects. Dar-Ape 22:57, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Let's get the actual discussion over, then decide whether to historic or not. DoomsDay349 23:00, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- It might be best to simply decide now as part of this MfD. I could be wrong, but I don't remember participating in any XFDs that had a "part two" which decided between historic tagging and deletion. Dar-Ape 23:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't really mind either way, I guess. Go ahead. DoomsDay349 23:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Really, the closing admin (whoever that lucky person is :)) should be able to obtain the consensus for historical-tagging or for outright deletion from the comments. I suggest that we leave it to that person, who can ask for help/clarification if unsure. Martinp23 (who likes his new sig) 23:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Mark as historical rather than delete
Because you can only avoid the mistakes of the past when you learn from them.
If all is well, this is procedure for all projects that have actually been operational.
Kim Bruning 03:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think people are going to to be able to learn what they need to from the MfDs... Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 03:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe. Maybe not. I agree with Kim. Mark as historical. Don't delete stuff that has a history. Carcharoth 04:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)