| Revision as of 23:28, 24 December 2006 editIanManka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators13,428 editsm →Editor review: fix link← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:29, 30 December 2006 edit undoTariqabjotu (talk | contribs)Administrators36,354 edits + reply from my talk pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| Thanks for having requested an ]. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at ], where you may read last minute additions. | Thanks for having requested an ]. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at ], where you may read last minute additions. | ||
| We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at ]. ] 23:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at ]. ] 23:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| Could you please tell me why the sprotected template is not necessary on the above page and only the sprotected 2 template? Suely its better to let new or unregistered users know that they can't edit ]<sup>See ] or ]</sup> 01:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :From ]: | |||
| :<blockquote>This template should be used for pages that are semi-protected for longer periods (for brief semi-protection please use {{tl|sprotected}}) or where the other semi-protection template may be untidy.</blockquote> | |||
| :] has been, and most likely will continue to be, semi-protected for a long period of time. Perhaps un-protection may occur when the article becomes linked from the Main Page. -- ''']''' 01:29, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:29, 30 December 2006
Wild Beasts Article
Your article Wild beasts was deleted after consensus at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wild beasts. Do not recreate the article. If you want a review of the deletion decision, go to Misplaced Pages:Deletion review. NawlinWiki 05:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- I see that you are having a bit of trouble adding a request for deletion review on Wild beasts. Is there anything I can do to help you? Aecis 16:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
It's just the normal thing to do. You wanted a deletion review, so you're entitled to have the deletion reviewed. As I said in my reply to your nomination, the band Wild beasts doesn't yet pass the notability guidelines set by WP:MUSIC. Perhaps I also need to explain what I meant with "without prejudice", because that's a bit of jargon. It means that I don't oppose an article about Wild beasts once they are notable enough, or an article that asserts their notability right now. It means that I agree with the deletion of this particular version of the article. I believe that at this point in their career, Wild beasts haven't achieved enough for a wikipedia entry. While the deletion review is underway, you might also want to have a look at our list of requested articles. A lot of bands, singers, music genres, record labels etc. are still without an article. Perhaps you know enough about one or more of them, so that you can help fill in the gaps of wikipedia. Yours, Aecis 13:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Re: Tag for vandalism
I use a collection of a few scripts which make vandal reverting/warning nearly automatic, so that I can do it more quickly. Some of what I use (primarily rollback) are reserved for administrators only, but the Popups script is a popular one with many users. (ESkog) 19:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Vandilism Comments
Please do not believe that all changes are sandbox games or vandalism. Your presence in the Wikipedian world is rather recent. 82.250.60.102
- Misplaced Pages is about facts and should not be used to canvas personal opinion like you did on the page, this WILL be classed as vanidilism, I have also responded to your talk page Ryanpostlethwaite 17:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
This IS NOT and WAS NOT vandalism. 82.250.60.102
"If this is not vandilism you are wrtining in a completely biased unencyclopedic style, if you want to edit it, I have no problem with that, just change your style to be unbiased and make encylopedic comments Ryanpostlethwaite 17:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)".
- You cannot even spell words correctly. How can you tell what is encyclopedic and what is not? Misplaced Pages is not the right place for you. 82.250.60.102
I am glad to see you found back reasonable ways of acting. 82.250.60.102
Help with Editor Review
I don't know if your question has been answered yet, but since it doesn't seem to need administrator intervention, if it hasn't been resolved, I suggest posting to Misplaced Pages:Help Desk instead, since that type of help is more in their realm. Good luck! Anchoress 01:57, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Lakeland.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Lakeland.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Blank
Yeah yeah, I know, I was a bit lazy but I knew that if I blanked it, it would get someone's attention. ^_^ Lordofchaosiori 01:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Hello
Thanks for adopting me Umm how do i change my name?--Blackshaq 05:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Esperanza!
Welcome, Ryanpostlethwaite, to Esperanza! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.
Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is Stressbusters, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Misplaced Pages events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.
In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Proposals.
If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact our administrator general Natalya by email or talk page. Consider introducing yourself at the Esperanza talk page! Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC tutorial. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Misplaced Pages a better place to work!
Húsönd 18:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Editor review
Thanks for having requested an editor review. A month has passed since it has been posted there, and it has been archived. You can find it at Misplaced Pages:Editor review/ryanpostlethwaite, where you may read last minute additions. We would really appreciate your help in reviewing a random editor. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 23:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Sadam Hussein
Could you please tell me why the sprotected template is not necessary on the above page and only the sprotected 2 template? Suely its better to let new or unregistered users know that they can't edit RyanPostlethwaite 01:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- From Template:Sprotected2:
This template should be used for pages that are semi-protected for longer periods (for brief semi-protection please use {{sprotected}}) or where the other semi-protection template may be untidy.
- Saddam Hussein has been, and most likely will continue to be, semi-protected for a long period of time. Perhaps un-protection may occur when the article becomes linked from the Main Page. -- tariqabjotu 01:29, 30 December 2006 (UTC)