Revision as of 22:33, 22 November 2006 editBenJonson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,818 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 17:19, 30 December 2006 edit undoSmatprt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers9,273 edits provided samples of quotable sourcesNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
#<s>A section providing a rebutal of the anti-Stratfordian arguments is needed to balance out the article and address POV concerns.</s> Sorted |
|
#<s>A section providing a rebutal of the anti-Stratfordian arguments is needed to balance out the article and address POV concerns.</s> Sorted |
|
#'''Citations are needed for many of the claimed orthodox perspectives''', many of which use ]s such as 'the orthodox perspective is...'. Quotable sources include Sam Schoenbaum's ''Shakespeare's Lives'' and ''Shakespeare: A Documentary Life'', Jonathan Bate's ''The Genius of Shakespeare'', Park Honan's ''Shakespeare: a Life'', Irvin Leigh Matus's ''Shakespeare in Fact'' and . |
|
#'''Citations are needed for many of the claimed orthodox perspectives''', many of which use ]s such as 'the orthodox perspective is...'. Quotable sources include Sam Schoenbaum's ''Shakespeare's Lives'' and ''Shakespeare: A Documentary Life'', Jonathan Bate's ''The Genius of Shakespeare'', Park Honan's ''Shakespeare: a Life'', Irvin Leigh Matus's ''Shakespeare in Fact'' and . |
|
#'''Citations are needed for many of the anti-Stratfordian arguments'''. Any properly published (see below) anti-Stratfordian text is acceptable. Avoid giving undue weight to not-yet established or minority theories: this too would follow . |
|
#'''Citations are needed for many of the anti-Stratfordian arguments'''. Any properly published (see below) anti-Stratfordian text is acceptable. Quotable qources include ''The Mysterious William Shakespeare'' by Charlton Ogburn, ''Shakespeare by Any Other Name'' by Mark Anderson, and the . Avoid giving undue weight to not-yet established or minority theories: this too would follow . |
|
#In accordance with the previous point, all ideas that are only supported by references to '''self-published books''' or '''websites by non-experts in relevant disciplines, including theatre history, intellectual history, Shakespearean studies, textual criticism, etc.''' need to be weeded out (not because they're necessarily wrong, but because is to avoid citations to such texts). |
|
#In accordance with the previous point, all ideas that are only supported by references to '''self-published books''' or '''websites by non-experts in relevant disciplines, including theatre history, intellectual history, Shakespearean studies, textual criticism, etc.''' need to be weeded out (not because they're necessarily wrong, but because is to avoid citations to such texts). |
|
#Many '''typical anti-Stratfordian arguments''' are still missing, ''e.g.'' the claim that Shakespeare was not eulogized when he died. |
|
#Many '''typical anti-Stratfordian arguments''' are still missing, ''e.g.'' the claim that Shakespeare was not eulogized when he died. |