Revision as of 13:44, 26 August 2020 editDhalamh (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,410 edits →Lead reworking proposal: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:33, 7 September 2020 edit undoBruce leverett (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,712 edits →Lead reworking proposalNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
(3) I think the solidity/drawishness of the opening is related to the early trade of Queens. Is this worth mentioning somewhere? If so, I can try to source a good reference to back this up.] (]) 13:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC) | (3) I think the solidity/drawishness of the opening is related to the early trade of Queens. Is this worth mentioning somewhere? If so, I can try to source a good reference to back this up.] (]) 13:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
:This seems reasonable. May I make a couple of additional suggestions: | |||
:*"Berlin Wall" does not rise to the level of being an actual name of the variation; it was used by chess journalists for a while after Kramnik revived the line, but not |
Revision as of 01:33, 7 September 2020
Articles for creation B‑class | ||||||||||
|
Chess C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Lead reworking proposal
The lead section should give "the basics in a nutshell and cultivates interest in reading on". I propose (1) changing the lead to this:
The Berlin Defence, also called the Berlin Wall, is a chess opening that begins with the moves:
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6
The opening is a variation of the Ruy Lopez. After a period of disuse, it experienced a resurgence in popularity when Vladimir Kramnik used it extensively against Garry Kasparov in the 2000 Chess World Championships. Strategically, the Berlin Defence is normally used as a drawing weapon by players who want to obtain a draw as Black, and by players who prefer to play defensively and reach endgames.
(2) Move the Encylopedia codes to a list at the end of the article, similar to other chess articles. I think these codes are given too much prominence in a few articles, as they're more for the specialized reader.
(3) I think the solidity/drawishness of the opening is related to the early trade of Queens. Is this worth mentioning somewhere? If so, I can try to source a good reference to back this up.Dhalamh (talk) 13:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- This seems reasonable. May I make a couple of additional suggestions:
- "Berlin Wall" does not rise to the level of being an actual name of the variation; it was used by chess journalists for a while after Kramnik revived the line, but not