| Revision as of 00:22, 23 December 2006 edit81.179.65.38 (talk) →Images← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:26, 1 January 2007 edit undo74.106.19.218 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{Mainpage date|June 15|2005}} | {{Mainpage date|June 15|2005}} | ||
| {{v0.5|class=FA|category=Natsci}} | {{v0.5|class=FA|category=Natsci}} | ||
| {{FAOL|Chinese|zh:貓眼星雲|lang2=Spanish|link2=es:Nebulosa Ojo de gato}} | |||
| ==Ambiguous sentence== | ==Ambiguous sentence== | ||
Revision as of 17:26, 1 January 2007
Template:Featured article is only for Misplaced Pages:Featured articles. Template:Mainpage date Template:V0.5 Template:FAOL
Ambiguous sentence
From the article:
- The image reveals two 'caps' of less ionised material at the edge of the nebula
Should it be read as that the material in these regions are less ionised compared to other regions; or that the concentration of ionised particles is lower, or something else?
If it is singly ionized nitrogen; does it have to be mentioned at all? In such case it is already mentioned in the text that green represents singly ionized nitrogen. Gunnar Larsson 19:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Images
Why have they suddenly all disappeared? Several beautiful NASA public domain images have been deleted for no apparent reason.
- The question has been here for a month, and no explanation offered.... were they just deleted for fun, then? 81.179.65.38 00:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)