Revision as of 15:59, 11 September 2020 editNewimpartial (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,776 edits Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:22, 11 September 2020 edit undoNewimpartial (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,776 edits →Expanding scope?: replyNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
: Also, while I am happy to discuss her before inclusion and pursue improved sources, I don't see any serious opposition in the RS to the idea that Jordan Peterson has disseminated the conspiracy theory, and therefore no BLP violation in saying so since it is not a controversial claim. ] (]) 15:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC) | : Also, while I am happy to discuss her before inclusion and pursue improved sources, I don't see any serious opposition in the RS to the idea that Jordan Peterson has disseminated the conspiracy theory, and therefore no BLP violation in saying so since it is not a controversial claim. ] (]) 15:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
::We need something more than an opinion piece on ]. ]] (]) 15:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC) | ::We need something more than an opinion piece on ]. ]] (]) 15:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
::: Agreed. I have added new text with a proper source. ] (]) 16:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:22, 11 September 2020
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Expanding scope?
I'm glad that at long last this article has been created. It needs to be noted, however, that not everyone who uses the term is buying into the conspiracy theory. So my question is, do we want to expand the article to include the *term* and/or the thing people are referring to by it (if not the conspiracy theory)? StAnselm (talk) 14:41, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Do you have any reliable sources documenting use of the term in other senses? No-one had provided any, prior to the split. Newimpartial (talk) 14:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- This is a balanced review that should be in the article; it also mentions the British use of the term. StAnselm (talk) 15:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- I think the article distinguishes between the "conspiracy theory" and the "conservative narrative" of people like Peterson. If we are going to mention Peterson, I think we would need to adjust the scope of the article (and move it to Cultural Marxism). StAnselm (talk) 15:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- How do you see that as a distinction in the article? I read the "conspiracy theory" and the "conservative narratice" as depicted in that source as essentially the same thing, while the distinction it makes is between those appropriations and actual intellectual movements on the left and in the universities. Newimpartial (talk) 15:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- I think the article distinguishes between the "conspiracy theory" and the "conservative narrative" of people like Peterson. If we are going to mention Peterson, I think we would need to adjust the scope of the article (and move it to Cultural Marxism). StAnselm (talk) 15:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- This is a balanced review that should be in the article; it also mentions the British use of the term. StAnselm (talk) 15:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Also, while I am happy to discuss her before inclusion and pursue improved sources, I don't see any serious opposition in the RS to the idea that Jordan Peterson has disseminated the conspiracy theory, and therefore no BLP violation in saying so since it is not a controversial claim. Newimpartial (talk) 15:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- We need something more than an opinion piece on thestranger.com. StAnselm (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. I have added new text with a proper source. Newimpartial (talk) 16:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- We need something more than an opinion piece on thestranger.com. StAnselm (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class Alternative views articles
- Low-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles