| Revision as of 04:27, 2 January 2007 editTUF-KAT (talk | contribs)48,707 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:27, 2 January 2007 edit undoTUF-KAT (talk | contribs)48,707 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| **Done ] 19:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC) | **Done ] 19:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Funny, the excerpts are gone. ] 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | :Funny, the excerpts are gone. ] 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Weak oppose''' because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | *'''Weak oppose''' because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. ] 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:27, 2 January 2007
U2
A lot of work has been done on this one in the past weeks (references, pictures, cleanup). I think it is ready to be considered.Buc 18:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Object, just after a quick look-lead is too short and doesn't summarize the article, citation needed tags need to have refs found and made.Sumoeagle179 18:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: would like to see the fair use media files placed in context at appropriate points within the article, rather than in its own section. The JPS 19:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Funny, the excerpts are gone. Wiki-newbie 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak oppose because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. Tuf-Kat 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)