| Revision as of 14:39, 17 September 2020 editIsochrone (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,080 edits →ArchiveTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:53, 19 September 2020 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,461 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Berrely/Archives/2020/August. (BOT)Next edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk:Berrely/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=720}} | {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk:Berrely/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=720}} | ||
| {{Monthly archive list|root=User talk:Berrely/Archives/|startyear=2019|monthformat=mmmm|index=User:ClueBot III/Master Detailed Indices/User talk:Berrely|bot=ClueBot III|age=30}} | {{Monthly archive list|root=User talk:Berrely/Archives/|startyear=2019|monthformat=mmmm|index=User:ClueBot III/Master Detailed Indices/User talk:Berrely|bot=ClueBot III|age=30}} | ||
| == Correct warning == | |||
| Was really the warning you intended to issue? ]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 18:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|WikiDan61}}, no it isn't, I meant to click the inappropriate external links button but it seems I misclicked. I'll correct it as soon a possible. Thanks for bringing it up! — Yours, ] • ]∕] 18:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Rollback == | == Rollback == | ||
Revision as of 07:53, 19 September 2020
| This is Isochrone's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page watchers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
 Archives |
|
2020 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Rollback
Hi, Got a feeling there's been been a miscommunication somewhere. I noticed on the talk page of an article that it needed to be rewritten because it was composed of copyrighted material. I rewrote a lot of the page, and left a note that I had been doing so, but now have been copyright-flagged for doing so. Now the changes have been rolled back so the original contributions are gone and copyrighted material is public.
Hi there Rvdimitri, I'm confused myself, when looking at the edit you made, I could see it was heavily copied from another website. Have you been rewriting the page using copyrighted material? (Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four keyboard tildes like this: ~~~~. Or, you can use the button, which automatically signs posts.) — Yours, Berrely • ∕Contribs 20:04, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Hmm. Maybe it looks that way because I moved a lot of the original copyrighted information under new subheadings? I've been rewriting it periodically but thought rewriting the whole thing in a single edit was a bit ambitious. I haven't added a single word of copyrighted writing to the page (though I'd hope single words can't be copyrighted, anyway). Thanks Rvdimitri (talk) 20:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Rvdimitri
Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Hi Isochrone,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.
Persecution of Hindus
Hello! Thanks for asking for revision deletion for Persecution of Hindus. On investigation, I found that the copied text was published in 1893 and was therefore in the public domain. So this was a case of plagiarism rather than a copyright violation. When copying compatibly licensed material, attribution is required. See this page for instructions on how to proceed if you come across this situation again. I have reinstated the text and added attribution at the end of the reference section, but please note that this is the first time I have done this, and I may have got things wrong! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:08, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Cwmhiraeth, sorry, I completely missed that! Thank you for clearing that up. If anything I'm in the wrong! Apologies for the inconvenience. — Yours, Berrely • ∕Contribs 10:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Better to err on the side of caution than leave a copyvio in place! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:45, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyright infrigement
Hi, Berrely!
I read your notification about copyright problems in The Tolbooth, Aberdeen.
I'm so sorry about that and I will be extra-careful in further editions. I promise!
Kind regards, Knewdates (talk) 17:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Knewdates, it's fine, as long as you make sure not to copy from non-free sources, there is no cause for concern! — Yours, Berrely • ∕Contribs 18:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Misplaced Pages's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Misplaced Pages for promotional purposes?
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 17
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (July and August 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 17th issue of the Misplaced Pages Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
Stay safe --DannyS712 (talk) 19:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Misplaced Pages Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Misplaced Pages style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Category talk:Roman Catholic prayers on a "Misplaced Pages style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Extremely Sorry! need Help!
I am really sorry about the previous edits I made. I was making edits from my POV and I know that Bajrang dal is a disputed area here on wikipedia. I really am sorry and as I am new to the platform could you please tell me how to find relevant sources regarding the article Bajrang Dal as we do not believe it to be a "militant organization" whereas it COULD be represented as a "paramilitary organization". please help thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superbsic (talk • contribs) 05:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Air India Kolkata London Flight
I know that Kolkata-London is under Vande Bharat Mission but if you see the Heathrow Page then you will find Vistara and Air India from Kochi and Amritsar which are also under Vande Bharat. In Amritsar Airport’s Page you can find London Flight. Then what is the problem in adding it in Kolkata Airport Page? Also it can be booked by anyone who have a UK Visa valid for more than 6 months...If you agree with me please add it in the airport’s page NilInfinite (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- NilInfinite, LHR - ATQ is a scheduled flight. It used to operate before COVID. If it's mentioned in Kochi, it's wrong. Kolkata Airport is a good article (an ideal article), so follow its format to edit other Indian airport articles and not vice-versa. I hope you understand. ❯❯❯ S A H A 09:56, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
A baklava for you!
Hi,
Thank you for helping me at CivicActions page! I am glad for that. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- No problem! — Yours, Berrely • ∕Contribs 16:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Please read this article that confirms the closure of the magazine
- The article already says the closure, and those are cited by reliable source. Please provide inline citations to reliable source. — Yours, Berrely • ∕Contribs 09:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Archive
I want you to archive discussions With nothing in 10 days.Acidic Carbon (Corrode) 13:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Acid Of Carbon it seems you already have. — Yours, Berrely • ∕Contribs 14:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)