Revision as of 16:45, 2 January 2007 editSpartaz (talk | contribs)Administrators52,776 edits User-Talk:Dmcdevit← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:54, 2 January 2007 edit undoNewyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,486 editsm →[]: fix redlink in section headerNext edit → | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
You have a pseudo AFD at ], that you used for posing a question in BostonMA's RfA. Another user there commented that this AFD page triggered a content filter on his computer. If you intend to repeat use of the question, could you create/find some similar AFD that wouldn't trigger a content filter? There ought to be one around that is equally challenging, but doesn't trigger content filters. ] 15:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | You have a pseudo AFD at ], that you used for posing a question in BostonMA's RfA. Another user there commented that this AFD page triggered a content filter on his computer. If you intend to repeat use of the question, could you create/find some similar AFD that wouldn't trigger a content filter? There ought to be one around that is equally challenging, but doesn't trigger content filters. ] 15:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
== ] == | == ] == | ||
Er I think you misread my meaning and also what side in this dispute I'm on. :-) --] 16:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | Er I think you misread my meaning and also what side in this dispute I'm on. :-) --] 16:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:54, 2 January 2007
user - talk - contributions - email - desk - sandbox - status:
This user is on an administrative Wikibreak. Please do not leave messages wishing for this user to use their admin tools until further notice. |
|
MessagesArchives: The Basement · My desk · My Barnstars A barnstar for you
Pseudo-AFD question for RfAYou have a pseudo AFD at User:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington/Desk/AfD, that you used for posing a question in BostonMA's RfA. Another user there commented that this AFD page triggered a content filter on his computer. If you intend to repeat use of the question, could you create/find some similar AFD that wouldn't trigger a content filter? There ought to be one around that is equally challenging, but doesn't trigger content filters. GRBerry 15:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC) User talk:DmcdevitEr I think you misread my meaning and also what side in this dispute I'm on. :-) --Spartaz 16:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |