Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tawker: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:07, 3 January 2007 editOrphanBot (talk | contribs)654,820 edits Problem with fairuse image upload← Previous edit Revision as of 07:08, 3 January 2007 edit undoTawker (talk | contribs)Administrators18,670 editsm Reverted edits by OrphanBot (talk) to last version by BzukNext edit →
Line 82: Line 82:
==A request for assistance== ==A request for assistance==
Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. ] 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC). Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. ] 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).
==Fair use rationale for Image:TransLink FareCard Jan 07.jpg==
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under ] but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to ] and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. 07:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:08, 3 January 2007

Tawker is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon.


Ok, the bot takes care of almost everything I do, I'm swamped with work right now. I'm outta here. If you need anything urgent, email me. -- Tawker 01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tawker/Dec07. Sections without timestamps are not archived

Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives


Bot

Hello tawker. Can you please program some bots for me on wikireligion. Thanks. Here is the link to it. The bots name I first want you to program is JamesBot. Leave me a message at wikireligion please. --Sir James Paul 02:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Danumber1bot

Thank you for approving Danumber1bot. When should it start getting to work? Please respond on my talk page. Thanks. --Imdanumber1 ( Talk | contribs) 18:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


Regarding Borderline/a_Kiwi_temp

I was directed by a admin to create this page in order to have a page where editors can work on a mass Scheduled for Deletion. She (Zeraeph) put them all in in-line mode, hidden from view, so no one can find them to edit. She did this yesterday morning, they all will be deleted. She brooks no disagreement.

See Here - http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:A_Kiwi#Following_things_from_VPT_post What you want on your article revision is a temporary page, which is usually created as a sub-page. So Borderline Personality Disorder (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) is cut out and copied into Borderline Personality Disorder/Kiwi's Temp. Everyone can edit it, talk about it, and such 'offline' from the main pages. - FrankB

Thank you for setting your VandalBot from deleting this page, BUT since this will be happening regularly now, it will be named it ---- Borderline/POV_work_page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by A Kiwi (talkcontribs) 20:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC).

I dealt with this. joshbuddy, talk 20:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

AntiVandalBot suggestions

Hi! May I make a suggestion within the idea of WP:BITE? Perhaps if there is no talk page instead of doing just a warning, what-about doing a {{Welcome}} with the warning? (or {{welcomeip}} for ips) It might help goodwill a little bit. ---J.S 03:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Interesting. Tawker, what do you think? --Cyde Weys 03:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Hoffa fett - request unblock

Tawker, could you consider unblocking User:Hoffa fett. My request comes in relation to the copyvio matter. The user is pursuing copyright permission and appears to now be consulting information to properly pursue establishing articles with copyrighted material. Take a look at the last section of User talk:Hoffa fett for latest conversation on this matter. Could you let me know if you would be favorably or unfavorably disposed to removing the indefinite block so that the user could pursue proper channels in relation to copyrighted material? Thanks. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks; I see you've unblocked. Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:39, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:BAG

Hello. I would like to be on the bot approvals group, and since you yourself are in the group, it would be great if you can stop by and either support or oppose my request. Thank you! —Mets501 (talk) 23:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Bots

Hey talker, I noticed your edits on Misplaced Pages:Bots and although I don't understand them I don't really need to either, I was curious if you could add {{botnav}} though, it'd be a little more helpful for people that stumble their way to that article. Vicarious 03:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

HAPPY NEW YEAR

Hooray for my business contact! MESSEDROCKER 05:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Werdnabot problem

Just so you know, on January 1, Werdnabot tried to archive five sections of this talk page to your January 2006 archive but failed because that file is protected (this caused Werdnabot to cease operating for the day). I am reverting its edit removing those sections from your talk. I also changed the year to 2007 in your Werdnabot invocation; and left this message to let you know what happened. JRSpriggs 05:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Translators available

Hi,

I just wonder if something prevents you from continuing to use your bot to contact the available translators on this page.

Cheers,

Jmfayard 15:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

AVB

AVB reported User:24.45.225.68 in this edit even though the IP had only made one edit in the last month. I'd thought I'd stop by to tell you since you're the runner of the bot. Happy New Year! -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Bots

Hi Tawker; I was wondering why it is that AVB needs Misplaced Pages:Bots to function. Would it work if the page was a redirect and below the redirect there was the required content, so the software would still interpret it as a redirect? —Mets501 (talk) 04:25, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


A request for assistance

Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).