Revision as of 07:37, 3 January 2007 editRalbot (talk | contribs)57,708 edits Signpost delivery using AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:35, 3 January 2007 edit undoPaul Silverman (talk | contribs)573 edits don't vandalise my pageNext edit → | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 07:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC) | <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 07:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
== don't vandalise my page == | |||
I would have vandalised yours back but it's already empty, maybe a bit like between your ears. ] 23:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:35, 3 January 2007
File:Wikirpbanner1.gif |
|
User talk:Red Pooka | ||||||||||
Note to usersColored font may not show up correctly on this page. If you have a signature that has yellow in it, I suggest you type it manually. :) Also, on 29th of every month, the Talk page is automatically archived, no matter how many topics are on it at the time. Just a heads up. One more thing, this area is shared with both Misplaced Pages and Uncyclopedia. If you are from Uncyc, please use it's own page.
Misplaced Pages TalkLast warning on vandalizing imagesI've kindly asked you to follow Misplaced Pages policies and you reluctantly agreed, now only to go back on that. By removing the deletion notices on those images, you are vandalizing. I have asked you nicely, to simply add a fair use rationale to prevent the images from being deleted and instead of doing so, you continue to remove the deletion warning. You could have written fair use rationales for all of "your" images that are subject to deletion in the same amount of time you have been revert warring with me. Furthermore, you have continued to re-add fair use images to your userpage, even though this is against policy. I have asked you to stop. I have given you the opportunity to explain your actions. You have essentially ignored me and called me a vandal. Consider this your final warning. The next step is to ask another admin to review your actions and possibly block you. I obviously won't block you as that is a conflict of interest. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 07:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Re: Undelete!
Unfortunately, I don't know which pages you'd like to be undeleted. You see, the contributions page doesn't keep track of deleted pages. Would you be able to give me the titles of the pages which need undeletion? Thanks, Martinp23 22:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've undeleted {{trainz}}, but I'd prefer to leave the Wikiproject for JzG, as it wasn't "user request" as far as I can see. TRS2006 has never been deleted, so there's nothing for me to undelete, and I'm afraid that I have no knowledge at all of the topic, so don't have any idea what the other pages could be. It would help if you could give wikilinks to all those you know were deleted, and post such a list to my talk page and JzG's page. Then we can both look through and undelete whee appropriate. Thanks, Martinp23 22:39, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- OK - I've done that page, and all the images linked from it. I suggest that you go through them and check the licensing, as some of they say "I stole this...". Martinp23 22:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Sig
Hey, I saw your question at the Help Desk. I'm not sure if that's the best signature, I wondered if you're aware of the policies at Misplaced Pages:Sign your posts on talk pages in reference to signatures that are especially long in code or especially eye catching. It's up to you, of course, but I figured I'd let you know that that sig (and your current one, maybe) might bother other folks. Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions or want to discuss anything. Peace, delldot | talk 02:04, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, no clue. The help desk wasn't helpful, huh? delldot | talk 20:10, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Entertainment Now
I do not understand why you have deemed the creation of a legitimate page 'vandalism'. Entertainment Now is a start up soon to be launched in the UK, eTalk has no relation to it other than it being a past name, why re-direct 'Entertainment Now' to 'eTalk' when there is now a legitimate need for 'Entertainment Now'.
I take great offence in you deeming my company unworthy of a wikipedia page.
Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 1 | 2 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
don't vandalise my page
I would have vandalised yours back but it's already empty, maybe a bit like between your ears. Paul Silverman 23:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)