| Revision as of 13:00, 30 December 2006 editSmackBot (talk | contribs)3,734,324 editsm Date the maintenance tags using AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:39, 4 January 2007 edit undo68.37.58.214 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Many countries are requiring the ignition interlock as a penalty for drivers convicted of driving under the influence, especially repeat offenders. Most U.S. states now permit judges to order the installation of an IID as a condition of probation; for repeat offenders, and for first offenders in some states, installation may be mandated by law. Despite the claims of critics that IIDs are inaccurate, ineffective and dangerous , in November of 2006 ] (MADD) launched a highly publicized campaign advocating mandatory IID installation for all first offenders . Some politicians in Japan, Canada, the U.S. and other countries have called for such devices to be installed as standard equipment in all motor vehicles sold. | Many countries are requiring the ignition interlock as a penalty for drivers convicted of driving under the influence, especially repeat offenders. Most U.S. states now permit judges to order the installation of an IID as a condition of probation; for repeat offenders, and for first offenders in some states, installation may be mandated by law. Despite the claims of critics that IIDs are inaccurate, ineffective and dangerous , in November of 2006 ] (MADD) launched a highly publicized campaign advocating mandatory IID installation for all first offenders . Some politicians in Japan, Canada, the U.S. and other countries have called for such devices to be installed as standard equipment in all motor vehicles sold. | ||
| Drinking and driving is not that bad. You are a wimp if you need to read this. | |||
| ==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 04:39, 4 January 2007
 | Template:Wikify is deprecated. Please use a more specific cleanup template as listed in the documentation. |
A breath alcohol ignition interlock device (BIID or IID) is a mechanism similar to a breathalyzer which is installed in a vehicle's dashboard. Before the vehicle can be started, the driver must breathe into the device. If the analyzed result is over a programed blood alcohol concentration, commonly .02% or .04%, the vehicle will not start.
At random times after the engine has been started the IID will require another breath sample. The purpose of this is to prevent a friend from breathing into the device, enabling the intoxicated person to get behind the wheel and drive away. If the breath sample isn't provided, or the sample exceeds the ignition interlock's preset blood alcohol level, the device will log the event, warn the driver and then start up an alarm (e.g., lights flashing, horn honking, etc.) until the ignition is turned off. A common misconception is that interlock devices will simply turn off the engine if alcohol is detected; this would, however, create an unsafe driving situation and expose interlock manufacturers to considerable liability.
Modern ignition interlock devices use an ethanol-specific fuel cell for a sensor. A fuel cell sensor is an electrochemical device in which alcohol undergoes a chemical oxidation reaction at a catalytic electrode surface (platinum) to generate an electrical current. This current is then measured and converted to an alcohol equivalent reading. Although fuel cell technology is not as accurate or reliable as infrared spectroscopy technology used in evidentiary breathalyzers, they are cheaper and tend to be more specific for alcohol.
The devices keep a record of the activity on the device and the interlocked vehicle's electrical system. This record, or log, is printed out or downloaded each time the device's sensors are calibrated, commonly at 30, 60, or 90 day intervals. Authorities may require periodic review of the log. If violations are detected, then additional sanctions can be implemented.
Periodic calibration is performed using either a pressurized alcohol/gas mixture at a known alcohol concentration, or with an alcohol wet bath arrangement that contains a known alcohol solution. The costs of installation, maintenance and calibration are generally paid by the offender, and typically run about $75 per month.
Among manufacturers of IIDs are Guardian Interlock, Smart Start, SOS, Ignition Interlock Systems, Intoxalock and Monitech. A list of federally-approved IID devices is maintained by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in their NHTSA Conforming Products List.
Many countries are requiring the ignition interlock as a penalty for drivers convicted of driving under the influence, especially repeat offenders. Most U.S. states now permit judges to order the installation of an IID as a condition of probation; for repeat offenders, and for first offenders in some states, installation may be mandated by law. Despite the claims of critics that IIDs are inaccurate, ineffective and dangerous , in November of 2006 Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) launched a highly publicized campaign advocating mandatory IID installation for all first offenders . Some politicians in Japan, Canada, the U.S. and other countries have called for such devices to be installed as standard equipment in all motor vehicles sold.
Drinking and driving is not that bad. You are a wimp if you need to read this.
External links
- Ontario Ministry of Transportation: Ignition Interlock
- Florida Ignition Interlock Program
- MADD: Ignition Interlock - Issue Brief
- Ignition Interlock Devices: Dangerous But Profitable
- Summary of State Laws Relating to IIDs in DUI Cases (National Conference of State Legislatures)