Misplaced Pages

:WikiProject Skepticism/List of questionable claims: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Skepticism Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:15, 4 January 2007 editI'clast (talk | contribs)1,511 edits →Concepts and methods: very controversial trmt & side effects; conventional MDs, skeptics, & pharmaceutical sources← Previous edit Revision as of 20:47, 4 January 2007 edit undoQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits I amend the creation of this list and move to project namespace so help me God.Next edit →
Line 251: Line 251:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] attack * ] attack
* ] * ]

Revision as of 20:47, 4 January 2007

This template must be substituted. Replace {{AFD with {{subst:AFD.

This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Misplaced Pages's deletion policy.
You may share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page.
Please improve the article if possible, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the guide to deletion.

Steps to list an article for deletion: {{subst:afd}} • Preloaded debate OR {{subst:afd2|pg=WikiProject Skepticism/List of questionable claims|cat=|text=}} • {{subst:afd3|pg=WikiProject Skepticism/List of questionable claims}} log

Template:Noncompliant

Main article: Quackery

The following is a list of Misplaced Pages articles and categories that are related to the subject of quackery. Inclusion here is not a statement that the subject is quackery or the person is a quack, only that scientific skeptics, debunkers, and consumer protection advocates consider the article to be related to the subject and of possible value when investigating the subject of quackery. Some listed items may be considered by them to be forms of quackery, promoters of quackery, openly against quackery, red flags for quackery, or mechanisms and thought patterns conducive to it. Both sides of the issues are included. See the individual articles for more information.


Concepts and methods

Organizations, journals, books, etc.

Persons

See also

Related categories

Further reading

  • The Skeptic's Dictionary: A Collection of Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions (Paperback) by Robert Todd Carroll, Robert T. Carroll (2003 Edition). John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-27242-6.

References

  1. The Skeptic's Dictionary

External links

Categories: