| Revision as of 20:26, 6 January 2007 editKanatonian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers26,422 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:16, 7 January 2007 edit undoIwazaki (talk | contribs)1,814 edits Remove bias sources ..add pov and hoax tagNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{{Hoax}} | |||
| {{Totally-disputed}} | |||
| {{Sri Lankan Conflict}} | {{Sri Lankan Conflict}} | ||
| '''Mylanthanai massacre''' happened on ] ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://brcslproject.gn.apc.org/slmonitor/March2003/resett.html | '''Mylanthanai massacre''' happened on ] ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://brcslproject.gn.apc.org/slmonitor/March2003/resett.html | ||
| Line 5: | Line 8: | ||
| ==Government investigation== | ==Government investigation== | ||
| According Sri Lanka monitor a neutral organisation in the ongoing ] following the massacre, an identification parade was held at ] Magistrate’s Court on ] ]. Survivors of the massacre identified 24 soldiers. The then ] transferred the case to ] District. He then without assigning any reason |
According Sri Lanka monitor a neutral organisation in the ongoing ] following the massacre, an identification parade was held at ] Magistrate’s Court on ] ]. Survivors of the massacre identified 24 soldiers. The then ] transferred the case to ] District. He then without assigning any reason transferred the case again to ] on grounds of safety for the accused. | ||
| This arrangment made it not only difficult for witnesses who are massacre survivors to appear but also intimidating. |
This arrangment made it not only difficult for witnesses who are massacre survivors to appear but also intimidating.{{fact}} | ||
| Indictment was filed in Colombo High Court only in September 1999. The case was heard by a jury of all majority ] speakers in ]. |
Indictment was filed in Colombo High Court only in September 1999. The case was heard by a jury of all majority ] speakers in ].{{fact}} | ||
| ==Controversy over aquital== | ==Controversy over aquital== | ||
| ] agencies and relatives of massacre victims expressed shock after 18 soldiers accused in the Mylanthanai case were released on ], ], when the jury returned a '''not guilty''' verdict. The jury confirmed the decision even after the judge ordered a reconsideration. Observers have expressed fear that the case will encourage impunity among the security forces.. | ] agencies and relatives of massacre victims expressed shock after 18 soldiers accused in the Mylanthanai case were released on ], ], when the jury returned a '''not guilty''' verdict. The jury confirmed the decision even after the judge ordered a reconsideration. Observers have expressed fear that the case will encourage impunity among the security forces.. | ||
| According to ''Northeastern Herald'' the ] refused to appeal the case citing convention although the constitution had provided for such appeals |
According to ''Northeastern Herald'' the ] refused to appeal the case citing convention although the constitution had provided for such appeals{{fact}} | ||
| |title=AG refuses to appeal the verdict|accessdate=2006-01-07 |format= |work=Tamilcanadian }}</ref> | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 05:16, 7 January 2007
{
 | The truthfulness of this article has been questioned. It is believed that some or all of its content may constitute a hoax. Please carefully verify any reliable sources used to support the claims in the article or section, and add reliable sources for any uncited claims. If the claims cannot be reliably sourced, consider placing the article at articles for deletion and/or removing the section in question. For blatant hoaxes, use {{db-hoax}} to identify it for speedy deletion instead. Further information and discussion may be on the article's talk page. |
Mylanthanai massacre happened on August 9 1992 when Sri Lankan Army soldiers from Punanai Army camp massacred 35 minority Sri Lankan Tamils, including 15 children, at Mylanthanai in Batticaloa District in Sri Lanka. Soldiers who were charged with the massacre were aquited by all majority Sinhalese speaking jury much to the shock of Human rights organisations and relatives.
Government investigation
According Sri Lanka monitor a neutral organisation in the ongoing Sri Lankan civil war following the massacre, an identification parade was held at Batticaloa Magistrate’s Court on April 2 1993. Survivors of the massacre identified 24 soldiers. The then Attorney General transferred the case to Polonnaruwa District. He then without assigning any reason transferred the case again to Colombo on grounds of safety for the accused.
This arrangment made it not only difficult for witnesses who are massacre survivors to appear but also intimidating.
Indictment was filed in Colombo High Court only in September 1999. The case was heard by a jury of all majority Sinhalese speakers in 2002.
Controversy over aquital
Human Rights agencies and relatives of massacre victims expressed shock after 18 soldiers accused in the Mylanthanai case were released on November 27, 2003, when the jury returned a not guilty verdict. The jury confirmed the decision even after the judge ordered a reconsideration. Observers have expressed fear that the case will encourage impunity among the security forces..
According to Northeastern Herald the Attorney General refused to appeal the case citing convention although the constitution had provided for such appeals
See also
References
- "Resettlement". Sri Lanka Monitor. Retrieved 2006-01-07.
- "Jury finds Mylanthanai massacre accused not guilty". Sri Lanka Monitor. Retrieved 2006-01-06.
- "Human Rights accountability, first". UTHR. Retrieved 2006-01-07.
 | This Sri Lanka–related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |