Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tawker: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:51, 7 January 2007 editMisza13 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,559 edits →AVB is.... not a bot?: reply (sorry for cutting in ;) )← Previous edit Revision as of 15:39, 7 January 2007 edit undoWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 2 sections to User talk:Tawker/Jan07Next edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
Archives (by month) @ ] Archives (by month) @ ]



==Werdnabot problem==
Just so you know, on January 1, Werdnabot tried to archive five sections of this talk page to your January 2006 archive but failed because that file is protected (this caused Werdnabot to cease operating for the day). I am reverting its edit removing those sections from your talk. I also changed the year to 2007 in your Werdnabot invocation; and left this message to let you know what happened. ] 05:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hi,

I just wonder if something prevents you from continuing to use your bot to contact the available translators on this page.

Cheers,

] 15:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


== AVB == == AVB ==

Revision as of 15:39, 7 January 2007

Tawker is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon.


Ok, the bot takes care of almost everything I do, I'm swamped with work right now. I'm outta here. If you need anything urgent, email me. -- Tawker 01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tawker/Dec07. Sections without timestamps are not archived

Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives


AVB

AVB reported User:24.45.225.68 in this edit even though the IP had only made one edit in the last month. I'd thought I'd stop by to tell you since you're the runner of the bot. Happy New Year! -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Bots

Hi Tawker; I was wondering why it is that AVB needs Misplaced Pages:Bots to function. Would it work if the page was a redirect and below the redirect there was the required content, so the software would still interpret it as a redirect? —Mets501 (talk) 04:25, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


A request for assistance

Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).

Vandalism Project

I've heard through the grapevine that since you run the anti-vandal bot that you might be a good person to talk to about getting some stats regarding vandalism. I have recently put together Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Vandalism studies with the intended goal of studying vandalism on wikipedia. Any help would be much appreciated. Remember 21:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

AVB problem

Please check out AVB's talk page. We now have two cases, today alone, where the bot triggered on one edit, but reverted back two edits, and warned the innocent editor from the older edit. And this is just those that have complained. Something is definitely misfiring with the bot. Not quite to the point of hitting the stop button on it, but I am definitely concerned at the situation. - TexasAndroid 22:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar

Thanks :)

I apologize, but what do you mean by diff checks?

Thanks again -- Where 00:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

AVB is.... not a bot?

Is AntiVandalBot supposed to have a bot flag? Special:Listusers/bot suggest it doesn't have one (which is odd). If it needs a bot flag, I think you have to get a bureaucrat to do it. --h2g2bob 10:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

No, AVB is not supposed to be flagged as a bot. Bots do not show up on Special:Recentchanges by default and we want to see what AVB is doing. Миша13 14:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)