Revision as of 15:34, 24 November 2020 editNiteshift36 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers41,775 editsm →ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageTag: Manual revert← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:09, 2 December 2020 edit undoNeutrality (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators165,397 edits →Note re: edits in certain topic areas: new sectionTags: Reverted contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
I'd completely forgotten about this. It's all good. ] (]) 16:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC) | I'd completely forgotten about this. It's all good. ] (]) 16:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
:I figured haha but still didn't feel right to now edit articles about the things I used to complain about. Cheers! ♫ ] (]) 12:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC) | :I figured haha but still didn't feel right to now edit articles about the things I used to complain about. Cheers! ♫ ] (]) 12:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
== Note re: edits in certain topic areas == | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
You have shown interest in ] and ]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
It looks like the last time any of these were posted was 2018, so re-upping the alerts. --]<sup>]</sup> 15:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:09, 2 December 2020
I detest stalkers, especially those who can't get their facts straight.
Dave Aronberg
Thank you for your edit, but it appears to be a huge “political” story that trended on every media outlet on the planet because the politician and his ex were divorced over politics. It is the issue the subject is most known for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monologuebaby (talk • contribs) 03:21, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- "Every media outlet on the planet"? Seriously? You honestly expect anyone to take that claim seriously? Niteshift36 (talk) 16:25, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Prod on David M. Malone
Drmies has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Wikiwings
Wikiwings | ||
For extraordinary contributions to Aircraft in fiction, thus improving hundreds of aircraft type articles along the way! - Ahunt (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC) |
Barnstar
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar may be awarded to those that show a pattern of going the extra mile to be nice, without being asked.
This barnstar is awarded to User:Niteshift36, for his dedication to compromise and his ability to work with other editors to come up with amicable solutions which satisfy everyone. Thank you for your valiant efforts to the project. Ikip (talk) 02:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC) |
Re: Our earlier disputes
Hello, I'd like to formally apologize for any hurt feelings I may have caused, on the stormfront (website) page. I think we all have heated opinions about this, but I look forward to working with you to make a better article for everyone. Cheers :) Mr. Kent (talk) 23:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
A beer for you!
No worries, Niteshift--I was happy to back you up there (that was easy anyway, since you were right). Man, some people need to get out more, so they don't have so many words left when they get here. Cheers! Drmies (talk) 22:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC) |
Peace
~ Kimelea (talk) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Thank you, fine by me. Let's move on. ~ Kimelea (talk) 21:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Just from another editor who works on Florida articles. ...William 00:01, 19 May 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
You are courageous. MONGO 03:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
A beer for you!
More beer! Drmies (talk) 05:18, 9 November 2012 (UTC) |
- Who doesn't love free beer. :) Niteshift36 (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Tell you what, I had the opposite happen tonight. Old neighbor comes by, there's a bottle of champagne, she and Mrs. Drmies claim to be tired etc; by the time they're gone and I'm thinking about finishing that bottle, it's empty after all. Plus they were disrespecting the Clint Eastwood movie I was watching, tsk tsk. Also, I made a promise: to not respond at ANI. Hey, we're all buddy-buddy now, with all this stuff going on, but weren't we in a fight a couple of months ago? Where you were wrong, of course. Later! Drmies (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
For working with me on Dave Aronberg article. You've supported him, I was dead set against his most recent bid for office, but we worked together to make the article encyclopedic rather than looking like a press release. ...William 17:45, 9 November 2012 (UTC) |
PC reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Misplaced Pages:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Misplaced Pages:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Misplaced Pages:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:15, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Hi, Niteshift - i have a problem and could use your help. My husband is Kermit Alexander and we have been trying to update his page to be more relevant and approachable. All the edits I have been making seem to become undone. Pictures from our personal files seem to be deleted. I am so technically challenged so I become frustrated after reading hours and hours of how-tos just to be dismissed. So how can you and I become friends that you will contribute to Kermit Alexander's? He worked really hard to become an author and now I'm stumpted on how to tell the world about his efforts. Hanna33 (talk) 23:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC) |
Evading block
Hey, this is a heads-up: CrazyAces was blocked for six months on his original account and an IP account (see User talk:173.52.99.208) for one month. If you find another account which resembles him, he is evading a block and should be taken to ANI. Sorry to bother you with this, but you know his habits as much as I do.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 01:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- I caught up on that when I saw the block on his talk page (I have it watch listed). Always something with him. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oh okay good. He mentioned another account used since February 2016. It must still exist somewhere but I haven't found any user which resembles his "style". I'm not going to get too search too deep because he always seems to make a scene at some point or another.
- Update: The account was/is User:BlackAmerican, at least I safely can say so by comparing editing styles. I contacted Bishonen about it and am waiting for a response. Another big.clean-up will be underway because I have seen handfuls of bare links and unnotable subjects.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 16:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Named in an article
Be advised, it seems you have been mentioned in an off-wiki article .--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Wow, someone is pretty literal. You have to love a troll that doesn't allow anyone to comment or correct his errors. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- After reading that article, I'll bet the author's mommy still cuts his meat for him.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 19:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Lol. Quite possibly. He actually thinks I claim to be an actual Jedi. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- After reading that article, I'll bet the author's mommy still cuts his meat for him.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 19:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewing
Hello, Niteshift36.
I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. |
Misplaced Pages
Hello it's been awhile since I've been on here. Although, we've come into contact through Misplaced Pages gang related articles. While we have had disputes over handling of race issues which I am very socially liberal about, I apologize for coming at you hostile. We need to be allies in order to make things work. There are bigger political issues on Misplaced Pages and I think you know what I'm talking about. There are Wikipedians who don't value freedom of speech or freedom of information, and I honestly wouldn't doubt that they are being payed off this very moment. While we disagree on some points, we both have something in common: a love for the Constitution, accuracy, and presentation of facts. There is few of us here on Misplaced Pages and we are outnumbered. Neutral point of view, lack of COI, and accuracy of information needs to be kept alive here. ++ 03:36, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
FYI
Apparently you're famous, just thought you should know. Cheers. - WOLFchild 20:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, she loves me. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Peace and former apology
♫ TheGridExe (talk) has given you a dove!
I would like to formally apologize for a personal attack I made back in February 2012 about edits pertaining to a location with city limits. It seems better for me to address it as I now know differences between city limits and unincorporated counties and it's been wrong for me to verbally attack another fellow editor.
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
I'd completely forgotten about this. It's all good. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- I figured haha but still didn't feel right to now edit articles about the things I used to complain about. Cheers! ♫ TheGridExe (talk) 12:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Note re: edits in certain topic areas
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
It looks like the last time any of these were posted was 2018, so re-upping the alerts. --Neutrality 15:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)