| Revision as of 05:16, 21 December 2020 editHapHaxion (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers70,918 edits Added {{Cleanup bare URLs}} tagTag: Twinkle← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:51, 21 December 2020 edit undoRJFJR (talk | contribs)Administrators155,205 edits Filled in 7 bare reference(s) with reFill 2Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Cleanup bare URLs|date=December 2020}} | {{Cleanup bare URLs|date=December 2020}} | ||
| {{Terri Schiavo}} | {{Terri Schiavo}} | ||
| During the ] in March 2005, a ]s memo on the controversy was written by ], the legal counsel to ] Senator ] of ].<ref name=autogenerated1> |
During the ] in March 2005, a ]s memo on the controversy was written by ], the legal counsel to ] Senator ] of ].<ref name=autogenerated1>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna7412110|title=Senator’s office produced Schiavo memo|website=NBC News}}</ref> The memo suggested the Schiavo case offered "a great political issue" that would appeal to the party's ] (core supporters) and could be used against Senator ], a ] from ] who was up for ], because he had refused to co-sponsor the bill which came to be known as the ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002213728_memo20.html|title=The Seattle Times: Nation & World: GOP memo says issue offers political rewards<!-- Bot generated title -->}}</ref> Bill Nelson was nevertheless reelected as Senator on November 7, 2006 with 60% of the vote. | ||
| Martinez stated that he had not read the memo before he inadvertently passed it to ] Senator ], a Democratic supporter of the ] legislation which gave ] ] to review the Terri Schiavo case.<ref name=autogenerated1 /> Then it became public knowledge. | Martinez stated that he had not read the memo before he inadvertently passed it to ] Senator ], a Democratic supporter of the ] legislation which gave ] ] to review the Terri Schiavo case.<ref name=autogenerated1 /> Then it became public knowledge. | ||
| After the existence of the memo was reported by ] and '']'', Senate Majority Leader ] denounced the memo and asserted that the Republican Party's interest in the case was solely based on moral grounds. Darling remained silent about his authorship of the memo as commentators from the conservative magazine '']'' and other publications questioned its authenticity.<ref> |
After the existence of the memo was reported by ] and '']'', Senate Majority Leader ] denounced the memo and asserted that the Republican Party's interest in the case was solely based on moral grounds. Darling remained silent about his authorship of the memo as commentators from the conservative magazine '']'' and other publications questioned its authenticity.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/406istku.asp|title=The ABCs of Media Bias<!-- Bot generated title -->}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/416virea.asp|title=Fake but Accurate Again?<!-- Bot generated title -->}}</ref> The source of the memo had not been disclosed by either ABC News or ''The Washington Post''. ''The Washington Post'' says that it neither implied that the memo originated from a Republican source nor that it was circulated by Republicans, though it did in fact make these assertions when it published the story by reporters Mike Allen and Manuel Roig-Franzia on its wire service on March 19, 2005. The authorship claim was removed before publication of the print version on March 20, 2005.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A11250-2005Mar29.html|title=Doubts Raised On Schiavo Memo (washingtonpost.com)|website=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24015-2005Apr3.html|title=Leaving the Anchor Desk, Its Greatest Generation (washingtonpost.com)|website=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref> On April 6, 2005, Darling admitted to writing the memo, and resigned his position as legal counsel to Senator Martinez.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/|title=Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis|website=Washington Post}}</ref> | ||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 05:51, 21 December 2020
 | This article uses bare URLs, which are uninformative and vulnerable to link rot. Please consider converting them to full citations to ensure the article remains verifiable and maintains a consistent citation style. Several templates and tools are available to assist in formatting, such as reFill (documentation) and Citation bot (documentation). (December 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Articles relating to the |
| Terri Schiavo case |
|---|
| Others involved |
|
 Category |
During the Terri Schiavo controversy in March 2005, a talking points memo on the controversy was written by Brian Darling, the legal counsel to Republican Senator Mel Martinez of Florida. The memo suggested the Schiavo case offered "a great political issue" that would appeal to the party's base (core supporters) and could be used against Senator Bill Nelson, a Democrat from Florida who was up for reelection in 2006, because he had refused to co-sponsor the bill which came to be known as the Palm Sunday Compromise. Bill Nelson was nevertheless reelected as Senator on November 7, 2006 with 60% of the vote.
Martinez stated that he had not read the memo before he inadvertently passed it to Iowa Senator Tom Harkin, a Democratic supporter of the Palm Sunday Compromise legislation which gave federal courts jurisdiction to review the Terri Schiavo case. Then it became public knowledge.
After the existence of the memo was reported by ABC News and The Washington Post, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist denounced the memo and asserted that the Republican Party's interest in the case was solely based on moral grounds. Darling remained silent about his authorship of the memo as commentators from the conservative magazine Weekly Standard and other publications questioned its authenticity. The source of the memo had not been disclosed by either ABC News or The Washington Post. The Washington Post says that it neither implied that the memo originated from a Republican source nor that it was circulated by Republicans, though it did in fact make these assertions when it published the story by reporters Mike Allen and Manuel Roig-Franzia on its wire service on March 19, 2005. The authorship claim was removed before publication of the print version on March 20, 2005. On April 6, 2005, Darling admitted to writing the memo, and resigned his position as legal counsel to Senator Martinez.
References
- ^ "Senator's office produced Schiavo memo". NBC News.
- "The Seattle Times: Nation & World: GOP memo says issue offers political rewards".
- "The ABCs of Media Bias".
- "Fake but Accurate Again?".
- "Doubts Raised On Schiavo Memo (washingtonpost.com)". www.washingtonpost.com.
- "Leaving the Anchor Desk, Its Greatest Generation (washingtonpost.com)". www.washingtonpost.com.
- "Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis". Washington Post.