| Revision as of 17:40, 7 January 2007 editH2g2bob (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,401 edits →AVB is.... not a bot?← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:51, 9 January 2007 edit undoWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 2 sections to User talk:Tawker/Jan07Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| |}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-5 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Tawker/(!month)07--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-5 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Tawker/(!month)07--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | ||
| Archives (by month) @ ] | Archives (by month) @ ] | ||
| == AVB == | |||
| AVB reported ] in even though the IP had only made one edit in the ]. I'd thought I'd stop by to tell you since you're the runner of the bot. Happy New Year! -]<small>(]·]·])</small> 23:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Tawker; I was wondering why it is that AVB needs ] to function. Would it work if the page was a redirect and below the redirect there was the required content, so the software would still interpret it as a redirect? —<span style="font: small-caps 14px times; color: red;">] (])</span> 04:25, 3 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:51, 9 January 2007
 | Tawker is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon. |
Ok, the bot takes care of almost everything I do, I'm swamped with work right now. I'm outta here. If you need anything urgent, email me. -- Tawker 01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tawker/Dec07. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives
A request for assistance
Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).
Vandalism Project
I've heard through the grapevine that since you run the anti-vandal bot that you might be a good person to talk to about getting some stats regarding vandalism. I have recently put together Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Vandalism studies with the intended goal of studying vandalism on wikipedia. Any help would be much appreciated. Remember 21:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
AVB problem
Please check out AVB's talk page. We now have two cases, today alone, where the bot triggered on one edit, but reverted back two edits, and warned the innocent editor from the older edit. And this is just those that have complained. Something is definitely misfiring with the bot. Not quite to the point of hitting the stop button on it, but I am definitely concerned at the situation. - TexasAndroid 22:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Re: Barnstar
Thanks :)
I apologize, but what do you mean by diff checks?
Thanks again -- Where 00:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
AVB is.... not a bot?
Is AntiVandalBot supposed to have a bot flag? Special:Listusers/bot suggest it doesn't have one (which is odd). If it needs a bot flag, I think you have to get a bureaucrat to do it. --h2g2bob 10:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- No, AVB is not supposed to be flagged as a bot. Bots do not show up on Special:Recentchanges by default and we want to see what AVB is doing. Миша13 14:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, that makes sense. Thanks --h2g2bob 17:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)