User talk:Tawker: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 15:51, 9 January 2007 editWerdnabot (talk \| contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 2 sections to User talk:Tawker/Jan07 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:54, 9 January 2007 edit undoNilfanion (talk \| contribs)17,230 edits My Request for AdminshipNext edit →
Line 37:		Line 37:
	:No, AVB is '''not''' supposed to be flagged as a bot. Bots do not show up on ] by default and we want to see what AVB is doing. ]] 14:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)		:No, AVB is '''not''' supposed to be flagged as a bot. Bots do not show up on ] by default and we want to see what AVB is doing. ]] 14:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
	:: Ah, that makes sense. Thanks --] 17:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)		:: Ah, that makes sense. Thanks --] 17:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

			== My Request for Adminship ==

			{\| style="background-color: #339999; border: solid 1px darkcyan;"
			\| ]
			\| style="background-color: #e8ffff; padding: 1em; border: solid 1px darkcyan;" \| Thank you for your support in my ], which passed with a tally of '''117/0/1'''. I hope that my conduct as an ] lives up to the somewhat flattering confidence the community has shown in me. Please don't hesitate to leave a message on ] should you need anything or want to discuss something; though I suspect my commons bit will be of more use for you. By the way you owe Cyde an "apology" for an edit conflict <tt>;)</tt>.--]] (]) 22:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
			\|}

Revision as of 22:54, 9 January 2007

Tawker is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon.

Ok, the bot takes care of almost everything I do, I'm swamped with work right now. I'm outta here. If you need anything urgent, email me. -- Tawker 01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tawker/Dec07. Sections without timestamps are not archived

Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives

A request for assistance

Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).

Vandalism Project

I've heard through the grapevine that since you run the anti-vandal bot that you might be a good person to talk to about getting some stats regarding vandalism. I have recently put together Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Vandalism studies with the intended goal of studying vandalism on wikipedia. Any help would be much appreciated. Remember 21:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

AVB problem

Please check out AVB's talk page. We now have two cases, today alone, where the bot triggered on one edit, but reverted back two edits, and warned the innocent editor from the older edit. And this is just those that have complained. Something is definitely misfiring with the bot. Not quite to the point of hitting the stop button on it, but I am definitely concerned at the situation. - TexasAndroid 22:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar

Thanks :)

I apologize, but what do you mean by diff checks?

Thanks again -- Where 00:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

AVB is.... not a bot?

Is AntiVandalBot supposed to have a bot flag? Special:Listusers/bot suggest it doesn't have one (which is odd). If it needs a bot flag, I think you have to get a bureaucrat to do it. --h2g2bob 10:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

No, AVB is not supposed to be flagged as a bot. Bots do not show up on Special:Recentchanges by default and we want to see what AVB is doing. Миша 13 14:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Ah, that makes sense. Thanks --h2g2bob 17:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

My Request for Adminship

Thank you for your support in my my RfA, which passed with a tally of 117/0/1. I hope that my conduct as an admin lives up to the somewhat flattering confidence the community has shown in me. Please don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page should you need anything or want to discuss something; though I suspect my commons bit will be of more use for you. By the way you owe Cyde an "apology" for an edit conflict ;).--Nilf anion (talk) 22:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)