Revision as of 17:15, 4 January 2021 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,407 editsm Signing comment by Kalle Divins - "falsified 'early' arrival of Islam"← Previous edit |
Revision as of 02:20, 5 January 2021 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,295,546 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Rohingya people/Archive 3) (botNext edit → |
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
| minthreadsleft = 3 |
|
| minthreadsleft = 3 |
|
}}{{Auto archiving notice|age=90|small=no|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
}}{{Auto archiving notice|age=90|small=no|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
|
|
|
== Rohingya Hindus == |
|
|
|
|
|
The wiki denotes Rohingyas are solely muslim which is false. Here are some links: |
|
|
|
|
|
* https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/people/reference/rohingya-people/ - states "Myanmar is a majority-Buddhist state, but the Rohingya people are primarily Muslim, though a small number are Hindu and Christian" |
|
|
|
|
|
* https://religionnews.com/2019/05/08/swept-up-in-muslim-genocide-crisis-hindu-rohingyas-are-stuck-in-bangladesh |
|
|
|
|
|
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9N1vjLUWXAM - Hindu Rohingya celebration on Durga puja in Bangladesh <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
::Where did you put 99% of the articles stating they are Mulsims? The only source you have is National Geographic, which is obviously confusing the Hindus fleeing mass massacres by the ARSA as "Rohingyas." Give me one reliable source from a reputable academic. 100% of the books and 100% of journal articles state they are Muslims. Keep your political agenda elsewhere. ] (]) 19:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
:::: You say, "which is obviously confusing the Hindus fleeing mass massacres by the ARSA as "Rohingyas.".. do you have source to back up your claim that National Geographic is wrong? I also gave reference to youtube video. You are pushing your own agenda on this wikipedia article to revise the article continuously. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==No Hindu Rohingyas== |
|
==No Hindu Rohingyas== |
Hindu people in Rakhine state (Arakan) hates very much being called "Hindu Rohingyas", but they identify themselves as "Benglis" who profess Hinduism. As a consequence, Muslim Benglis(in Rakhine state) hate them back so much that they killed about 100 Hindus during Kha Maung Seik massacre.--Kalle Divins (talk) 06:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
As to this sentence "The Rohingya population trace their history to this period.", it is found out that sources after sources of references, all of them are not concrete in nature. This sentence should be deleted.--Kalle Divins (talk) 06:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
The claim by Sayed Islam saying that, by 788 CE, locals in Arakan were being converted into Muslims clearly contradicts historian Yegar's findings which say, even in 1203, Bengal is the eastern most point of Islamic expansion, not to say further into Arakan. (please see page 23 of the book "Between Integration and Secession: The Muslim Communities of the Southern Philippines, Southern Thailand, and Western Burma/Myanmar". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalle Divins (talk • contribs) 17:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)