25 September 2004
- 17:4817:48, 25 September 2004 diff hist +1,358 Talk:Creationism/What is wrong with the lead section →What is wrong with the lead section of []?
- 16:5916:59, 25 September 2004 diff hist +939 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →What ID's Opponents Say; is it really relevant?
- 07:2307:23, 25 September 2004 diff hist +1,132 Talk:Creationism/What is wrong with the lead section →What is wrong with the lead section of []?
24 September 2004
- 22:2922:29, 24 September 2004 diff hist +1,830 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →Meaning of "scientific"
- 21:4821:48, 24 September 2004 diff hist +1,522 Talk:Creationism/What is wrong with the lead section →What is wrong with the lead section of []?
- 17:4217:42, 24 September 2004 diff hist +1,224 Talk:Creationism/What is wrong with the lead section →What is wrong with the lead section of []?
- 16:5816:58, 24 September 2004 diff hist +834 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →Falsification
- 16:4516:45, 24 September 2004 diff hist +334 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →Falsification
23 September 2004
- 23:4923:49, 23 September 2004 diff hist +6 User:FeloniousMonk No edit summary
- 23:4523:45, 23 September 2004 diff hist +143 N User:FeloniousMonk No edit summary
- 23:4223:42, 23 September 2004 diff hist +582 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →Falsification
- 23:3323:33, 23 September 2004 diff hist +280 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →Falsification
- 23:2823:28, 23 September 2004 diff hist +247 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →What ID's Opponents Say; is it really relevant?
- 23:2223:22, 23 September 2004 diff hist +1,075 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →...who include the overwhelming majority of the scientific community...
- 18:2918:29, 23 September 2004 diff hist +460 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →Meaning of "scientific"
- 18:1918:19, 23 September 2004 diff hist +500 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →What ID's Opponents Say; is it really relevant?
- 08:4408:44, 23 September 2004 diff hist +102 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 No edit summary
- 08:4008:40, 23 September 2004 diff hist +544 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 No edit summary
- 08:2808:28, 23 September 2004 diff hist +2,303 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →What ID's Opponents Say; is it really relevant?
- 07:3607:36, 23 September 2004 diff hist −76 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →Does ID really qualify as a []?
22 September 2004
- 23:0823:08, 22 September 2004 diff hist −19 User talk:FeloniousMonk No edit summary
- 21:1821:18, 22 September 2004 diff hist +3 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →Does ID really qualify as a []?
- 21:1621:16, 22 September 2004 diff hist +592 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →Does ID really qualify as a []?
- 20:5820:58, 22 September 2004 diff hist +2 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →Does ID really qualify as a []?
- 20:5820:58, 22 September 2004 diff hist +619 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 →Does ID really qualify as a []?
21 September 2004
- 16:5716:57, 21 September 2004 diff hist +4 m What the Bleep Do We Know!? typo
- 16:5516:55, 21 September 2004 diff hist −1 User talk:FeloniousMonk No edit summary
- 16:5316:53, 21 September 2004 diff hist +714 User talk:FeloniousMonk No edit summary
20 September 2004
- 20:2820:28, 20 September 2004 diff hist +187 User talk:FeloniousMonk No edit summary
- 19:5919:59, 20 September 2004 diff hist +329 User talk:FeloniousMonk No edit summary
- 19:4819:48, 20 September 2004 diff hist +400 User talk:Eloquence Regarding Shroud of Turin article & JDG
- 19:4119:41, 20 September 2004 diff hist +319 Talk:Shroud of Turin Added comments on POV and future wikication of article
19 September 2004
- 04:4604:46, 19 September 2004 diff hist +1 m What the Bleep Do We Know!? typo
- 04:4404:44, 19 September 2004 diff hist +379 m What the Bleep Do We Know!? Added point on criticism of the film
15 September 2004
- 05:2805:28, 15 September 2004 diff hist −9 m Faith rv "(direct)" Inferred evidence is not evidence
14 September 2004
- 23:1023:10, 14 September 2004 diff hist −89 m Van Allen radiation belt rv spurious comment "Does the presence of this belt mean that the Lunar Missions could not have taken place?"
4 September 2004
- 06:0306:03, 4 September 2004 diff hist +393 Talk:What the Bleep Do We Know!? No edit summary
2 September 2004
- 06:4406:44, 2 September 2004 diff hist −22 m The Passion of the Christ minor wikifying, rm 'venerable' re: Emmerich, see Talk for comments
- 06:3806:38, 2 September 2004 diff hist +487 m Talk:The Passion of the Christ No edit summary
- 06:2206:22, 2 September 2004 diff hist +10 m Anne Catherine Emmerich Wikify, npov, various sp
- 06:1706:17, 2 September 2004 diff hist +415 Talk:Anne Catherine Emmerich No edit summary
25 August 2004
- 19:4419:44, 25 August 2004 diff hist +632 m Talk:Creationism No edit summary
- 16:4816:48, 25 August 2004 diff hist +928 m Talk:Creationism reply to Rednblu's comments on belief vs. explanation
24 August 2004
- 20:2420:24, 24 August 2004 diff hist −4,271 Matter rv to edit by 213.37.56.225 Discussion content was saved to article page by Ghitis.
19 August 2004
- 20:5220:52, 19 August 2004 diff hist −12 m Creationism mv new "see also" from tp of page to existing "see also" at bttm of page
- 20:4920:49, 19 August 2004 diff hist +2 m Intelligent design mv new "see also" from tp of page to existing "see also" at bttm of page
17 August 2004
- 17:0017:00, 17 August 2004 diff hist +112 m Creationism added link to nas science and creationism primer
- 16:3916:39, 17 August 2004 diff hist −114 Fringe science rv to last version by Maximus Rex. 65.30.121.64 - register if you intend to edit. Also protoscience was included in the correct list.
12 August 2004
- 18:4718:47, 12 August 2004 diff hist +4 Intelligent design ID is a conjecture, not a theory
- 18:3918:39, 12 August 2004 diff hist +1,103 Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 23 No edit summary
 |